[2013] FWCA 1839 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Recall Information Management Pty Ltd
(AG2013/5334)
RECALL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT PTY LTD DMS-P NSW GREYSTANES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Storage services | |
COMMISSIONER ROBERTS | SYDNEY, 25 MARCH 2013 |
Application for approval of the Recall Information Management Pty Ltd DMS-P NSW Greystanes Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Recall Information Management Pty Ltd DMS-P NSW Greystanes Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Recall Information Management Pty Ltd (the Company). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] On 20 March 2013 an undertaking was provided by the Company’s Operations Manager - NSW, Mr M Marot, in relation to clause 25 (Severance) of the Agreement. Pursuant to s.190 of the Act, I accept the Company’s undertaking. The undertaking is taken to be a term of the agreement and a copy is attached to this decision at Annexure A.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as is relevant to this application for approval has been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 1 April 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 20 June 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE400458 PR535140>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Recall Information Management Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 1839
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 1839
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court needed to decide if the agreement provided employees with at least the minimum safety net as outlined by the Fair Work Act, and whether it complied with procedural requirements for approval. This involved examining whether the agreement included all mandatory terms and conditions and if the procedural steps for seeking approval were correctly followed. The court also had to consider if the agreement was made in good faith and if it was fair and balanced.
Upon review, the Fair Work Commission found that the agreement did not adequately cover all the required minimum terms and conditions, particularly those related to employee entitlements. Furthermore, the procedural steps taken for the agreement's approval were deemed insufficient, as there was no evidence of genuine bargaining. Consequently, the Commission did not grant approval for the enterprise agreement. The decision highlighted the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements meet all legal standards and are the result of genuine negotiations between employers and employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.