Re

Case [1989] FCA 260


NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION

IN THE FEDERAL COURT

)

OF AUSTRALIA

)

GENERAL DIVISION

1

BANKRUPTCY

DISTRICT

1

OF THE STATE OF

1

WESTERN AUSTRALIA

)

NO. 6 of 1989X

RE: LYNTON COLIN VIANT

- _

Debtor

EX PARTE: ALDEN SON HALSE and

GARRY JOHN TREVOR

Applicants

CORAM :

FRENCH J.

8 MAY 1989

F , 7

:

.

?Al.

..

EX

TEMPORE

REASONS

FOR

JUDGMENT

I - - A I ~ , R Y

\'.S'

. \ /

<S

2 _--

I am satisfied that the original Deed of Arrangement in this matter which was executed on or about 10 March 1989 does not reflect the terms of the special resolution insofar as that special resolution makes provision for payment of the trustee's

fees. I am therefore satisfied that it was not entered into in

accordance with the requirements of Part X of the Act.

It is appropriate, in the circumstances, to declare that deed void. I am not prepared to accede to the request of the applicants that after declaring the deed void, I extend time for execution to enable the execution of a supplementary deed which can only be read together with the original deed, declared void by the effect of this order. That, I think, gives rise to potential

difficulties which are quite unnecessary having regard to the ease with which a new deed embodying the amendments proposed by the supplemental deed can be prepared and executed.

The orders I will make are as follows:

1.    It is hereby declared that the Deed of Arrangement

- .

entered between the debtor and the applicants on 10

March 1989 is void.

2.   That the time for execution of a Deed of Arrangement in this matter be extended to 15 May

1989.

I certify that this and the preceding

page are a true copy of the Ex Tempore

Reasons for Judgment of his Honour

Justice French.

Associate: L

Date: 5.

" S .

No appearance for the Debtor

Counsel for the Applicants: Mr K. Dundo

Solicitor for the Applicants: Robinson Cox

Date of Hearing: 8 May 1989

Date of Judgment: 8 May 1989

Details
AGLC
Re [1989] FCA 260
Case
[1989] FCA 260
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Federal Court of Australia, General Division Bankruptcy District of Western Australia, considered a matter involving a Deed of Arrangement between Lynton Colin Vian and the applicants, Alden Son Halse and Garry John Trevor. The applicants sought to have the Deed of Arrangement declared void due to discrepancies between the special resolution and the terms of the Deed, particularly in relation to the payment of the trustee's fees. The applicants argued that the Deed did not reflect the terms of the special resolution, and therefore, was not validly executed. The court needed to determine whether the Deed of Arrangement was properly executed in accordance with the requirements of Part X of the relevant Act, and whether the discrepancies warranted the declaration of the Deed as void.

The court found that the original Deed of Arrangement executed on or around 10 March 1989 did not reflect the terms of the special resolution regarding the payment of the trustee's fees. Consequently, the Deed was not executed in accordance with the statutory requirements of Part X of the Act. The court was satisfied that the Deed of Arrangement should be declared void due to this discrepancy. The applicants also requested an extension of time for the execution of a supplementary deed to address the discrepancies. However, the court declined this request, reasoning that it would create unnecessary difficulties and that a new Deed of Arrangement could be easily prepared and executed to reflect the terms of the special resolution.

In conclusion, the court declared the Deed of Arrangement void and extended the time for execution of a new Deed of Arrangement. The orders made by the court were that the Deed of Arrangement entered into on 10 March 1989 was declared void and that the time for execution of a new Deed of Arrangement was extended to 15 May 1989.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.