Re Westfield Corporation Limited (No 2)
Case
•
[2018] NSWSC 921
•20 June 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Re Westfield Corporation Limited (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 921
[2018] NSWSC 921
20 June 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Westfield Corporation Limited applied to the court for approval of a proposed scheme of arrangement, under section 411 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). The court was asked to determine whether the scheme was fair and reasonable to members of relevant classes of the company. A significant issue arose when new information became available after a securityholders' meeting, which the securityholders had not had the opportunity to consider. The court had to decide if this new information constituted an important supervening event that materially altered the scheme.
The court examined the nature of the new information and whether it was significant enough to be considered an important supervening event. The court considered that an important supervening event is one that materially alters the scheme and is not merely an expected risk of the investment. The court held that the new information did materially alter the scheme, as it impacted the value and risks associated with the investment. The court concluded that the scheme was no longer fair and reasonable, given the new information that emerged after the securityholders' meeting.
As a result of the court's decision, the application for approval of the scheme was dismissed. The court found that the scheme was no longer fair and reasonable to members of the relevant classes due to the important supervening event that materially altered the scheme. The court did not grant the orders sought by Westfield Corporation Limited.
The court examined the nature of the new information and whether it was significant enough to be considered an important supervening event. The court considered that an important supervening event is one that materially alters the scheme and is not merely an expected risk of the investment. The court held that the new information did materially alter the scheme, as it impacted the value and risks associated with the investment. The court concluded that the scheme was no longer fair and reasonable, given the new information that emerged after the securityholders' meeting.
As a result of the court's decision, the application for approval of the scheme was dismissed. The court found that the scheme was no longer fair and reasonable to members of the relevant classes due to the important supervening event that materially altered the scheme. The court did not grant the orders sought by Westfield Corporation Limited.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Corporate Law & Governance
Legal Concepts
-
Schemes of Arrangement
-
Fairness & Reasonableness
-
Supervening Events
-
Members' Rights
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Cellnet Group Limited, in the matter of Cellnet Limited (No 2) [2023] FCA 973
Cases Citing This Decision
18
In the matter of Telstra Corporation Limited (No 2)
[2022] NSWSC 1460
Re Telstra Corporation Ltd
[2022] NSWSC 1180
Cases Cited
8
Statutory Material Cited
2
Re Westfield Corporation Limited
[2018] NSWSC 584
Re Central Pacific Minerals NL
[2002] FCA 239
Re NRMA Ltd (No 2)
[2000] NSWSC 408