Re Trade Mark Application number 1790252 (35,44) Ramsay Pharmacy in the name of Ramsay Health Care Investments Pty Limited
Case
•
[2020] ATMO 11
•30 January 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Re Trade Mark Application number 1790252 (35,44) Ramsay Pharmacy in the name of Ramsay Health Care Investments Pty Limited [2020] ATMO 11
[2020] ATMO 11
30 January 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This decision concerns an application by Ramsay Health Care Investments Pty Limited for registration of the trade mark "Ramsay Pharmacy" in relation to pharmacy services. The application was opposed. The hearing officer, Debrett Lyons, was tasked with determining whether the trade mark should be accepted for registration.
The primary legal issue was whether the trade mark "Ramsay Pharmacy" was capable of distinguishing the services offered by the applicant from the services of other traders, as required by the relevant provisions of the *Trade Marks Act*. This involved considering the extent of use of the trade mark and its inherent adaptiveness to distinguish.
The hearing officer found that while some of the material exhibited by the applicant included a logo or design element in addition to the words "Ramsay Pharmacy", this did not necessarily preclude registration. Taking into account the evidence of use across a wide network of pharmacy stores, the inherent distinctiveness of the words themselves, and the applicant's existing use of "Ramsay"-formative marks in its core business, the hearing officer concluded that the trade mark should be registered.
The application was accepted subject to an endorsement that the provisions of section 41(4) of the *Trade Marks Act* were applied.
The primary legal issue was whether the trade mark "Ramsay Pharmacy" was capable of distinguishing the services offered by the applicant from the services of other traders, as required by the relevant provisions of the *Trade Marks Act*. This involved considering the extent of use of the trade mark and its inherent adaptiveness to distinguish.
The hearing officer found that while some of the material exhibited by the applicant included a logo or design element in addition to the words "Ramsay Pharmacy", this did not necessarily preclude registration. Taking into account the evidence of use across a wide network of pharmacy stores, the inherent distinctiveness of the words themselves, and the applicant's existing use of "Ramsay"-formative marks in its core business, the hearing officer concluded that the trade mark should be registered.
The application was accepted subject to an endorsement that the provisions of section 41(4) of the *Trade Marks Act* were applied.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
Legal Concepts
-
Statutory Construction
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Trade mark application number 1872858 (classes 36, 43, 44) – BRIGHTWATER - in the name of Brightwater Care Group Ltd [2021] ATMO 51
Cases Cited
7
Statutory Material Cited
0
Chocolaterie Guylian N.V. v Registrar of Trade Marks
[2009] FCA 891
Unilever Plc v Beiersdorf AG
[2017] ATMO 25
Unilever Plc v Beiersdorf AG
[2017] ATMO 25