Re the Governor of Western Australia: Ex Parte Keating
Case
•
[2007] WASC 323
•17 December 2007
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Re the Governor of Western Australia: Ex Parte Keating [2007] WASC 323
[2007] WASC 323
17 December 2007
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The parties involved in the matter of Re the Governor of Western Australia: Ex Parte Keating were the Governor of Western Australia and the applicant, Keating. The dispute revolved around the applicant's repeated attempts to commence proceedings against the Governor without any success. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of Western Australia, which was required to decide whether the applicant, who had been previously declared a vexatious litigant, should be granted leave to commence further proceedings against the Governor. The court was also required to determine whether the applicant's conduct constituted an abuse of process.
The court found that the applicant's repeated applications for leave to commence proceedings against the Governor had no prospects of success and were therefore vexatious. The court held that the applicant's conduct amounted to an abuse of process, as he had made repeated applications without any reasonable cause. The court noted that the applicant had failed to appear in court on multiple occasions, which further demonstrated the vexatious nature of his proceedings. The court held that the applicant's conduct was an abuse of the court's process and that any future applications by the applicant should not be listed for hearing without prior direction of a judge after consideration of the papers.
In light of the above, the court dismissed the applicant's application for leave to commence proceedings against the Governor. The court also gave directions that any future application by the applicant should not be listed for hearing without prior direction of a judge after consideration of the papers. This decision serves as a reminder that the court will not tolerate vexatious proceedings and will take steps to prevent abuse of its process.
The court found that the applicant's repeated applications for leave to commence proceedings against the Governor had no prospects of success and were therefore vexatious. The court held that the applicant's conduct amounted to an abuse of process, as he had made repeated applications without any reasonable cause. The court noted that the applicant had failed to appear in court on multiple occasions, which further demonstrated the vexatious nature of his proceedings. The court held that the applicant's conduct was an abuse of the court's process and that any future applications by the applicant should not be listed for hearing without prior direction of a judge after consideration of the papers.
In light of the above, the court dismissed the applicant's application for leave to commence proceedings against the Governor. The court also gave directions that any future application by the applicant should not be listed for hearing without prior direction of a judge after consideration of the papers. This decision serves as a reminder that the court will not tolerate vexatious proceedings and will take steps to prevent abuse of its process.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Abuse of Process
-
Jurisdiction
-
Standing
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
IBRAHIM and CITY OF SOUTH PERTH [2021] WASAT 16
Cases Citing This Decision
4
IBRAHIM and CITY OF SOUTH PERTH
[2021] WASAT 16
Re the Governor of Western Australia; Ex Parte Keating
[2013] WASC 84
IBRAHIM and CITY OF SOUTH PERTH
[2021] WASAT 16
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
1
Re the Governor of Western Australia;
[2007] WASC 228
Re the Governor of Western Australia;
[2007] WASC 228