Re Stoverink
Case
•
[2008] QLC 152
•29 July 2008
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Re Stoverink [2008] QLC 152
[2008] QLC 152
29 July 2008
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of Re Stoverink involved an application for a mining lease by Antonius Gerhardus Albertus Stoverink and Bernardus Johannes Maria Stoverink under section 245 of the Mineral Resources Act 1989. The applicants sought a mining lease over a specified area for the purpose of mining opal and establishing living quarters for a term of ten years. The application was lodged on 15 January 2008 and no objections were lodged before the closing date of 11 June 2008.
The court was required to decide whether the application complied with the provisions of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 and whether the criteria set out in section 269(4) of the Act were satisfied. The court considered the evidence provided by the applicants and the Mining Registrar, including the Additional Information and Statutory Declaration, the Mining Registrar’s Report, and the draft environmental authority. The court found that the applicants had complied with the requirements of the Act and that the criteria in section 269(4) had been satisfied. The court was satisfied that the land was mineralised, that there would be an acceptable level of development and utilisation of the mineral resource, that the size and shape of the lease was appropriate, and that the applicants had the necessary financial and technical capabilities to carry on the proposed mining operations. The court also found that there would be no adverse environmental impacts and that the public right and interest would not be prejudiced.
The court recommended to the Honourable the Minister for Mines and Energy that the Mining Lease be granted over the whole of the application area for the purpose and term sought by the applicants. The court also ordered that a hearing of this application be dispensed with. The final orders were that the parties each hold a 50% share in the mining lease.
The court was required to decide whether the application complied with the provisions of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 and whether the criteria set out in section 269(4) of the Act were satisfied. The court considered the evidence provided by the applicants and the Mining Registrar, including the Additional Information and Statutory Declaration, the Mining Registrar’s Report, and the draft environmental authority. The court found that the applicants had complied with the requirements of the Act and that the criteria in section 269(4) had been satisfied. The court was satisfied that the land was mineralised, that there would be an acceptable level of development and utilisation of the mineral resource, that the size and shape of the lease was appropriate, and that the applicants had the necessary financial and technical capabilities to carry on the proposed mining operations. The court also found that there would be no adverse environmental impacts and that the public right and interest would not be prejudiced.
The court recommended to the Honourable the Minister for Mines and Energy that the Mining Lease be granted over the whole of the application area for the purpose and term sought by the applicants. The court also ordered that a hearing of this application be dispensed with. The final orders were that the parties each hold a 50% share in the mining lease.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Recommendation
-
Compliance
-
Land Use
-
Environmental Compliance
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Re Stoverink [2008] QLC 152
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0