Re Roger Gregory Matson

Case [1980] FCA 214


J

!'

.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

)

DIVISION

GENERAL

!

r

1

BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE STATE )No. N.S.W.

780 of 1977

OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND THE

I

AUSTRALIAN

CAPITAL

TERRITORY

1

GREGORY

MATSON

ROGER

RE:

PARTE:

EX

OFFICIAL

RECEIVER

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Iq

1980

LOCKHART J

.'3

I give leave to the applicant, the Official Receiver

for the Bankruptcy District for the State

of New South Wales

and the Australian Capital Territory to file in Court, returnable

instanter, an application by the Official Receiver

for an order

that an undischarged bankrupt, Roger Gregory Matson,

be produced

to this Court by the Governor

of the Central Industrial Prison

of New South Wales

on Monday next,

22 September 1980.,

at 12.00

noon. The 0fficial"Receiver applies today, ex parte, for an order in the terms to which I have referred. The bankrupt has

applied to this Court for an order

of discharge from his

bankruptcy. The application is set down for hearing

on Monday

next at 12.00 noon.

The application for an order that the bankrupt

be

produced to this Court is

made by the Official Receiver upon the

ground that it

is, if not necessary, certainly desirable that

the bankrupt be here to presecute his application.

I am informed

by the solicitor for the Official Receiver that the bankrupt has

indicated that he wishes to

be in Court when his application for

discharge is heard.'

. .

. / 2

-2-

It was submitted that

a possible source of

jurisdiction of this Court to

order the production

of the

bankrupt from the custody of the Governor of the Central

Industrial Prison of New South Wales

is S. 44 of the Prisons

-

Act 1952 of the State of New South Wales.

Plainly that cannot be

a source of jurisdiction

because it is a section of an Act passed by the New South

l -

Wales Parliament which has no competence to confer-$ower on this Court.

Although the matter has not been debated at any length

and the question

is not an entirely easy one,

in my view there

is power

in this Court

to make the order sought.

Section 23 of the Federal Court

o f Australia Act 1976

provides that this Court has power,

in relation to matters

in

which it has jurisdiction, to make orders of such kinds,

including interlocutory orders, as the Court thinks fit. As

this Court has undoubted power to hear an application for

discharge of

a bankrupt under the Bankruptcy Act,

in my view

S . 23 may be relied upon as

a source of power to make the order

sought, so that the bankrupt can be before the Court not only

to prosecute his application for discharge; but

so that he may

be here-

to answer any questions that may be put to him by

the Official Receiver

or any creditor who may appear,

or the

Court itself.

An independent head of power

is S . 30 of the Bankruptcy

-

Act 1966 which provides,

so far as relevant, that the Court may

make such orders as it considers necessary for the purpose

of

. .

. /3

!

-3-

carrying out

or giving effect to the Act

in any case of

bankruptcy - see S . 30 (1) (b).

Order 33 R. 14 of the

Federal Court Rules has

a bearing on the matter as it provides

that a party requiring the production

of a prisoner from lawful

custody to give evidence

in proceedings before

the Court shall

move for an order to that effect, and that the motion shall be

made ex parte. The Rule also provides that the motion shall be

supported by an affidavit showing

the person in whoke custody

the prisoner is held and the reasons for which the proceedings

and attendance are required.

--

The Rule provides that the appropriate order shall be

in accordance with form

46 in the first schedule to the Rules.

Although there is no affidavit

in support of this application

I shall dispense with compliance with the Rules

in that respect

in all the circumstances.

Accordingly, the order of the Court

is that Roger

Gregory Matson,

a prisoner said to

be confined in the prison

known as the Central Industrial Prison

of the State of New South

Wales be produced to this Court by the Governor

of the said

prison under secure conduct on

22 September 1980 at the hour

of 12 noon and so on from day to day

until his attendance

is no

longer required by this Court

in connection with

the

application for discharge from bankruptcy that has been

made by Roger Gregory Matson.

Details
AGLC
Re Roger Gregory Matson [1980] FCA 214
Case
[1980] FCA 214
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, the Official Receiver for the Bankruptcy District for the State of New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory applied for an order to have the bankrupt, Roger Gregory Matson, produced before the Court. The application was made ex parte to ensure that Matson would be present for his application for discharge from bankruptcy, which was scheduled for hearing on the same day. The Official Receiver argued that Matson's presence was necessary or, at the very least, desirable to address any questions that might arise from the Official Receiver, creditors, or the Court itself.

The court considered whether it had the jurisdiction to order Matson's production from the Central Industrial Prison in New South Wales. It was noted that Section 44 of the Prisons Act 1952 of New South Wales could not confer power on the Federal Court. However, the court found that it had the inherent power to make such an order under Section 23 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976, which allows the court to make orders it deems fit in matters within its jurisdiction. Additionally, Section 30 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 provides the court with the authority to make necessary orders for the purposes of executing the Act, including ensuring that a bankrupt is present in Court.

The court determined that it had the jurisdiction to issue the order and granted the application. The order required Matson to be produced before the Court by the Governor of the Central Industrial Prison on the specified date and time, and remain available for as long as necessary for the proceedings related to his application for discharge from bankruptcy.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.