Re Public Trustee of Queensland
Case
•
[2012] QSC 281
•20 September 2012
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Re Public Trustee of Queensland [2012] QSC 281
[2012] QSC 281
20 September 2012
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The matter before the court involved the Public Trustee of Queensland, who was the custodian trustee of several managed investment schemes, seeking advice and directions from the Court. The Public Trustee, Opus Capital Limited, which was the managing trustee, and The Trust Company (Australia) Limited, a third party involved in the transfer of assets, were the parties to the dispute. The Public Trustee sought directions from the court regarding whether it should commence proceedings against Opus Capital Limited for the recovery of unpaid legal fees and whether it should comply with certain instructions received from Opus Capital Limited.
The court was required to decide whether it was appropriate for the Public Trustee to initiate legal proceedings against Opus Capital Limited to recover unpaid legal fees and whether the Public Trustee was authorised to comply with the instructions from Opus Capital Limited to transfer the assets of the managed investment schemes from the Public Trustee to The Trust Company (Australia) Limited. The court also needed to determine whether the Public Trustee could retain and assert a lien over the assets of the managed investment schemes to secure the claims for indemnification.
The court held that it was appropriate for the Public Trustee to commence proceedings seeking orders contained in the draft originating application. The court also held that the Public Trustee could properly comply with the Notices of Proper Instructions and the directions from Opus Capital Limited to transfer the assets of the managed investment schemes, subject to certain conditions. The court further held that the Public Trustee could retain and assert a lien over the assets of each scheme in an amount sufficient to meet the claims for which the Public Trustee seeks to be indemnified until such time as the right to indemnification and lien were finally determined by the court or agreed by the Public Trustee and Opus Capital Limited.
The court made directions in accordance with the relevant sections of the Public Trustee Act 1978 (Qld) and the Trusts Act 1973 (Qld). The court directed that it was appropriate for the Public Trustee to commence proceedings seeking orders contained in the draft originating application. The court also directed that the Public Trustee could properly comply with the Notices of Proper Instructions and the directions from Opus Capital Limited to transfer the assets of the managed investment schemes, subject to certain conditions. The court further directed that the Public Trustee could retain and assert a lien over the assets of each scheme in an amount sufficient to meet the claims for which the Public Trustee seeks to be indemnified until such time as the right to indemnification and lien were finally determined by the court or agreed by the Public Trustee and Opus Capital Limited.
The court was required to decide whether it was appropriate for the Public Trustee to initiate legal proceedings against Opus Capital Limited to recover unpaid legal fees and whether the Public Trustee was authorised to comply with the instructions from Opus Capital Limited to transfer the assets of the managed investment schemes from the Public Trustee to The Trust Company (Australia) Limited. The court also needed to determine whether the Public Trustee could retain and assert a lien over the assets of the managed investment schemes to secure the claims for indemnification.
The court held that it was appropriate for the Public Trustee to commence proceedings seeking orders contained in the draft originating application. The court also held that the Public Trustee could properly comply with the Notices of Proper Instructions and the directions from Opus Capital Limited to transfer the assets of the managed investment schemes, subject to certain conditions. The court further held that the Public Trustee could retain and assert a lien over the assets of each scheme in an amount sufficient to meet the claims for which the Public Trustee seeks to be indemnified until such time as the right to indemnification and lien were finally determined by the court or agreed by the Public Trustee and Opus Capital Limited.
The court made directions in accordance with the relevant sections of the Public Trustee Act 1978 (Qld) and the Trusts Act 1973 (Qld). The court directed that it was appropriate for the Public Trustee to commence proceedings seeking orders contained in the draft originating application. The court also directed that the Public Trustee could properly comply with the Notices of Proper Instructions and the directions from Opus Capital Limited to transfer the assets of the managed investment schemes, subject to certain conditions. The court further directed that the Public Trustee could retain and assert a lien over the assets of each scheme in an amount sufficient to meet the claims for which the Public Trustee seeks to be indemnified until such time as the right to indemnification and lien were finally determined by the court or agreed by the Public Trustee and Opus Capital Limited.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Trusts & Equity
Legal Concepts
-
Trust Formation
-
Fiduciary Duty
-
Equitable Estoppel
-
Specific Performance
-
Account of Profits
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
LM Investment Management Ltd (receiver apptd) (in liq) v Drake & Ors [2020] QSC 265
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Corbiere v Dulley
[2016] QSC 134
Public Trustee of Qld v Opus Capital Ltd
[2013] QSC 131
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
3
Glassock v The Trust Company (Australia) Pty Ltd
[2012] QSC 15
Salmi v Sinivuori
[2008] QSC 321