Re: Opposition by Mojosurf Pty Ltd to registration of trade mark application number 1886980 (class 43) – Mojo NOMAD (fancy) - in the name of Australia Hotels and Properties Limited

Case

[2019] ATMO 176

11 December 2019


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Re: Opposition by Mojosurf Pty Ltd to registration of trade mark application number 1886980 (class 43) – Mojo NOMAD (fancy) - in the name of Australia Hotels and Properties Limited [2019] ATMO 176 [2019] ATMO 176 11 December 2019

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned an opposition by Mojosurf Pty Ltd to the registration of the trade mark application number 1886980, styled "Mojo NOMAD (fancy)", in class 43, filed by Australia Hotels and Properties Limited. The opposition was heard by Kate Doherty, acting as delegate for the Registrar of Trade Marks.

The primary legal issues before the delegate were whether the applicant's trade mark was substantially identical or deceptively similar to earlier trade marks owned by the opponent under section 44 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth), whether the applicant's mark was capable of deceiving or causing confusion under section 58A, whether the applicant's mark was likely to cause confusion given the opponent's reputation under section 60, and whether the use of the mark would contravene provisions of the *Competition and Consumer Act 2010* (Cth) (specifically sections 18 and 29) or the tort of passing off.

The delegate found that the ground of opposition under section 60 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* was established. This ground relates to the likelihood of confusion arising from the opponent's reputation in its earlier marks. Having found this ground to be established, the delegate determined that the trade mark application would not proceed to registration.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property

  • Commercial Law

  • Statutory Interpretation

Legal Concepts

  • Standing

  • Intention

  • Estoppel

  • Remedies

  • Procedural Fairness

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0