Re: Opposition by Gail Margaret Austen to application under section 92 of the Act by Your Mates Brewing Company Pty Ltd to remove trade mark number 479506(32) - Goodtime Logo - and 569435(32) - Goodtime Logo (2),
Case
•
[2019] ATMO 173
•5 December 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Re: Opposition by Gail Margaret Austen to application under section 92 of the Act by Your Mates Brewing Company Pty Ltd to remove trade mark number 479506(32) - Goodtime Logo - and 569435(32) - Goodtime Logo (2), [2019] ATMO 173
[2019] ATMO 173
5 December 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an opposition by Gail Margaret Austen to an application by Your Mates Brewing Company Pty Ltd to remove two registered trade marks, numbers 479506 and 569435, both bearing the "Goodtime Logo" and registered in class 32. The decision was made by Debrett Lyons.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether Your Mates Brewing Company Pty Ltd had established grounds for the removal of the trade marks under section 92 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth), specifically concerning non-use. The court was required to determine if the trade marks had been genuinely used in Australia in relation to the goods for which they were registered, or if there was a proper reason for non-use.
The court found that the opposition to the removal of trade mark number 569435 was unsuccessful, meaning it would remain registered as is. However, the opposition was partially successful in respect of trade mark number 479506. The court ordered that the goods for which trade mark number 479506 was registered would be restricted, implying that its scope of protection would be narrowed.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether Your Mates Brewing Company Pty Ltd had established grounds for the removal of the trade marks under section 92 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth), specifically concerning non-use. The court was required to determine if the trade marks had been genuinely used in Australia in relation to the goods for which they were registered, or if there was a proper reason for non-use.
The court found that the opposition to the removal of trade mark number 569435 was unsuccessful, meaning it would remain registered as is. However, the opposition was partially successful in respect of trade mark number 479506. The court ordered that the goods for which trade mark number 479506 was registered would be restricted, implying that its scope of protection would be narrowed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Standing
-
Remedies
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
18
Statutory Material Cited
0
Rejfek v McElroy
[1965] HCA 46
Rejfek v McElroy
[1965] HCA 46
Optical 88 Ltd v Optical 88 Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2010] FCA 1380