Re Kerry (No 2)
Case
•
[2012] NSWCA 127
•09 May 2012
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Re Kerry (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 127
[2012] NSWCA 127
09 May 2012
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned a judicial review application for an order in the nature of certiorari in respect of a decision of the District Court, which had varied orders made by the Children's Court concerning the allocation of parental responsibility for a child. The applicant sought to challenge the District Court's decision on grounds of jurisdictional error and error on the face of the record.
The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether the District Court had committed jurisdictional error. Specifically, the court considered whether the District Court had wrongly rejected the relevance of principles from the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, failed to comply with s 9(2)(c) of the *Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998*, failed to implement s 79(3) of that Act, or failed to comply with ss 13 and 78A of the Act concerning Aboriginality.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the claims in prayers 1 and 2 of the further amended summons. The court reserved for future consideration the question of making any order as to costs of the proceedings to date, directing that any party seeking costs must serve the terms of the order sought and submissions within fourteen days, with responding submissions to be served within a further fourteen days. The balance of the further amended summons was remitted to the Equity Division for determination.
The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether the District Court had committed jurisdictional error. Specifically, the court considered whether the District Court had wrongly rejected the relevance of principles from the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, failed to comply with s 9(2)(c) of the *Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998*, failed to implement s 79(3) of that Act, or failed to comply with ss 13 and 78A of the Act concerning Aboriginality.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the claims in prayers 1 and 2 of the further amended summons. The court reserved for future consideration the question of making any order as to costs of the proceedings to date, directing that any party seeking costs must serve the terms of the order sought and submissions within fourteen days, with responding submissions to be served within a further fourteen days. The balance of the further amended summons was remitted to the Equity Division for determination.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Family Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
-
Costs
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Re Kerry (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 127
Most Recent Citation
BQZ v Challenge Community Services [2015] NSWCATAD 92
Cases Citing This Decision
19
SL v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services
[2016] NSWCA 124
“V V” v District Court of New South Wales
[2013] NSWCA 469
Re Kerry (No 2)
[2012] NSWCA 194
Cases Cited
10
Statutory Material Cited
4
Re Kerry
[2010] NSWCA 232
Craig v South Australia
[1995] HCA 58
Re Tracey
[2011] NSWCA 43