1186 75
| JUDGMENT | NO. *.~.s.*a*.aaam.ml |
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
)
| BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF VICTORIA | ) | No VP 510 of 1995 |
RE :
Judgment Debtor
EX PARTE: BOB0 NOMINEES PTY LIMITED
Petitioner
14 August 1995
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
LOCKHART J.:
I refused earlier this afternoon the debtor's second application to adjourn the petition. Having done so, counsel for the debtor and his instructor have decided to withdrawn from the proceeding, which they did. I made it clear that I did not regard that conduct as discourteous. That means the petitioner is in a position to proceed to have a sequestration order made, but I have adopted the course, in view of the events that have unfolded, of looking at the evidence that the debtor has filed in support of his opposition to the petition, in particular on the question of whether he is indebted to the petitioner.
That evidence consists of the debtor's own affidavit filed on 31 July, 1995, and an affidavit in response of M r Peter Szanto filed in Court on 2 August 1995. Taking the debtor's affidavit entirely at face value, I am not persuaded that the affidavit of the debtor would entitle him to a finding that he is not indebted to the petitioning creditor.
- 2 -
There is nothing in his affidavit to suggest that he was induced to enter the guarantee on which he was sued (which appears to be one of February 1992, though it is not entirely clear) by the conduct of the petitioner in general, or Mr Szanto in particular. Nor is there any suggestion that anything was misrepresented to him, or that there was a duty owed to him by the petitioner, Mr Szanto, or anyone else arising from the circumstances that surrounded the signing by him of the two guarantees. There is, in short, no defence that could have been established on M r Keane's own affidavit, even if I took it at its face value.
Accordingly, the Court is satisfied of the proof of the matters of which S. 52 of the Bankruvtcv Act 1966 requires proof. I make a sequestration order against the Estate of John Aloysius Keane. The petitioning creditor's costs of, and incidental to, the petition (including reserved costs if any) shall be taxed and paid according to the statute.
The Court notes that no consent from a particular trustee has been filed; and that the date of the act of bankruptcy on which the petition in this matter is founded is 31 March 1995.
I certify that this and the
preceding' one (1) page are a true copy of the reasons for judgment herein of the Honourable Justiceockhart.
Associate
Dated: 14
- AGLC
- Re Keane, John Aloysius Ex Parte Bobo Nominees Pty Ltd [1995] FCA 1186
- Case
- [1995] FCA 1186
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue in this case was whether Keane was indebted to Bobo Nominees Pty Ltd, a matter which formed the basis of the sequestration petition. This required the court to examine the evidence provided by Keane, particularly his affidavit and the affidavit of Mr Peter Szanto, to determine the validity of the debt claimed by the petitioner. The court had to ascertain if the evidence provided any grounds for Keane to argue that he was not indebted to the petitioner, such as misrepresentation or inducement in entering into the guarantee.
Justice Lockhart carefully reviewed the evidence presented by Keane, including his affidavit and the affidavit of Mr Szanto. The court found that Keane's affidavit did not provide any evidence to suggest that he was induced to enter into the guarantee, that any misrepresentation occurred, or that there was any duty owed to him by the petitioner or Mr Szanto. The court concluded that there was no valid defence to the claim that Keane was indebted to Bobo Nominees Pty Ltd. Consequently, the court found that the requirements for a sequestration order under Section 52 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 were met.
Based on the findings, Justice Lockhart made a sequestration order against Keane's estate, declaring him bankrupt. The court also ruled that the costs of the petition, including any reserved costs, would be taxed and paid according to the statute. The court took note that no consent from a particular trustee had been filed and identified the act of bankruptcy date as 31 March 1995.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.