Re: Imogen (No. 4)

In the matter of *Re: Imogen (No. 4)*, Watts J of the Supreme Court of Victoria considered an application for leave to intervene in ongoing proceedings. The applicant, the D Group, sought to join the proceedings, but the specific nature of the underlying dispute and the identities of the original parties to the proceedings were not detailed in the provided extract.

The central legal issue before the Court was whether to grant the D Group leave to intervene in the proceedings. This required the Court to assess the merits of the application against the relevant legal principles governing intervention in litigation.

Watts J dismissed the D Group's application for leave to intervene. While the specific reasons for this dismissal are not elaborated in the provided text, the decision indicates that the Court found insufficient grounds to permit the D Group's participation in the proceedings. The formal order reflecting this decision was subject to entry in the Court's records.