Re: Imogen (No. 3)

In the matter of *Re: Imogen (No. 3)*, Watts J of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia considered an application concerning the welfare of a child, Imogen. The dispute involved the father's request for Imogen to attend interviews with a Dr B, and the court's role in facilitating this.

The central legal issue before the court was whether to make an order compelling Imogen to attend interviews with Dr B, and if so, on what terms. This required the court to consider the best interests of the child in the context of a proposed assessment or interview process.

Watts J reasoned that it was in Imogen's best interests to attend interviews with Dr B at reasonable times nominated by the father. The court further directed the Independent Children’s Lawyer to explain the basis of this order to Imogen, indicating a focus on ensuring the child understood the proceedings. The court's orders were contingent on their formal entry into the Court's records.