Re: George

In the matter of *Re: George*, Rees J of the Supreme Court of [State of Australia] was required to determine the competency of a young person, George, to consent to medical treatment for gender dysphoria. The dispute concerned the administration of Stage 2 treatment for this condition, as defined in the DSM-5.

The central legal issue before the Court was whether George possessed the requisite legal capacity to consent to the proposed medical treatment. This involved an assessment of his maturity, understanding, and ability to make an informed decision regarding his healthcare.

Rees J applied the principles of common law regarding the capacity of minors to consent to medical treatment. The Court considered George's age and developmental stage, his understanding of the nature and consequences of the proposed treatment, and his ability to make a voluntary and informed choice. The judgment implicitly found that George had attained the necessary capacity to consent to the Stage 2 treatment for gender dysphoria.

The Court declared that George was competent to consent to the administration of Stage 2 treatment for gender dysphoria. In addition, strict orders were made to anonymise the proceedings and protect George's identity, prohibiting publication of his full name, family members, hospital, legal representatives, school, and any other identifying details. Access to the court file was also restricted, requiring judicial leave for any searches.