Re Ernest John Summerfield & Cheryl Summerfield trading as East Coast Traders Ex Parte Tony Blain P/L trading as Acme T-shirts

Case [1993] FCA 8


8 rqs3

JUDGMENT NO. ........ ........ .. I ........ .U/

NOT SUITABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
1

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

) )

GENERAL DIVISION
) NP 2157 of 1992

RE: ERNEST JOHN SUMMERFIELD AND
CHERYL SUMMERFIELD tradina as EAST

COAST TRADERS

Debtors

EX PARTE: TONY BLAIN PTY LIMITED

tradina as ACME T-SHIRTS

Petitioning Creditor

RE: ERNEST JOHN SUMMERFIELD AND

CHERYL SUMMERFIELD

CORAM: Burchett J.

PLACE: Sydney RECE 1'. '
DATE : 5 January 1993 -2 FEB 1993
FEDERAL CWRT

AUSTRALIA

PRINCIWL REOISTRV

EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

BURCHETT J.:

debtors.

In these matters, there has been referred to the Court a

debtor's petition presented under S. 56 of the Bankruptcv Act

1966 by each of the debtors. The petitions have been referred

under subs. (7AA), as required by that subs., because the creditor's petition of Tony Blain Pty Limited was pending against the partnership of the debtors and against the

There are some problems in relation to the creditor's petition. In particular, the evidence filed suggests that the bankruptcy notice was not properly served upon the female debtor. There may also be a difficulty in relation to the compliance of the petition ltself with the rules. The first matter obviously would provide a very strong reason for giving a direction under S. 56(7AB)(a) in relation to the female debtor, and in the case of a partnership it is obviously desirable that the administration of each estate, so far as possible, be carried out by the same trustee.

There has been no suggestion from the creditor's representative that there is any particular matter which can be pointed to as indicating that the debtors should not become bankrupt upon their own petitions, and a perusal of the papers does not suggest to me that there is any such reason. In the circumstances, I think it is proper to give a direction under

S. 56 (7AB) (a) that the Registrar accept each of the debtors'

petitions, and I so direct.

true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of his I certify that this and the preceding page are a
Honour Mr Justice Burchett.
Associate:
Date: 5 January 1993
The debtors, who resided in Tasmania, did not appear.
Solicitor for the Petitioning
Creditor:  Mr G.R. Hear1 of
Messrs Aitken & Magney
Date of hearing:  5 January 1993
Details
AGLC
Re Ernest John Summerfield & Cheryl Summerfield trading as East Coast Traders Ex Parte Tony Blain P/L trading as Acme T-shirts [1993] FCA 8
Case
[1993] FCA 8
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved Ernest John Summerfield and Cheryl Summerfield, trading as East Coast Traders, who presented debtor's petitions under Section 56 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966. The petitions were referred to the Federal Court of Australia due to a pending creditor's petition from Tony Blain Pty Limited, trading as Acme T-Shirts. The court was tasked with determining whether the Registrar should accept the debtors' petitions despite the issues with the creditor's petition, particularly concerning the proper service of the bankruptcy notice on Cheryl Summerfield and possible rule compliance issues.

The legal issues centred around the validity of the debtors' petitions and the potential procedural errors in the creditor's petition. The court had to decide if there were sufficient grounds to accept the debtors' petitions despite the issues with the creditor's petition. The court also needed to consider the implications of having different trustees for the debtors' estates if the debtor's petitions were not accepted.

The court found that there were substantial issues with the creditor's petition, primarily regarding the improper service of the bankruptcy notice on Cheryl Summerfield. Furthermore, there was no indication from the creditor's representative or the court documents suggesting that the debtors should not be declared bankrupt based on their own petitions. Considering these factors, the court decided to direct the Registrar to accept the debtors' petitions under Section 56(7AB)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act. This decision ensured that both debtors' estates would be administered by the same trustee, which was deemed preferable for the management of the estates.

The court's final order was to direct the Registrar to accept the debtor's petitions presented by Ernest John Summerfield and Cheryl Summerfield, trading as East Coast Traders. The decision ensured the administration of both debtors' estates would be handled by the same trustee, facilitating a more cohesive and efficient process.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.