8 rqs3
JUDGMENT NO. ........ ........ .. I ........ .U/ NOT SUITABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) 1 NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
) )
GENERAL DIVISION
) NP 2157 of 1992
RE: ERNEST JOHN SUMMERFIELD AND
CHERYL SUMMERFIELD tradina as EASTCOAST TRADERS
Debtors
EX PARTE: TONY BLAIN PTY LIMITED
tradina as ACME T-SHIRTS
Petitioning Creditor
RE: ERNEST JOHN SUMMERFIELD AND
CHERYL SUMMERFIELD
CORAM: Burchett J.
PLACE: Sydney RECE 1'. ' DATE : 5 January 1993 -2 FEB 1993 FEDERAL CWRT
AUSTRALIA
PRINCIWL REOISTRV
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
BURCHETT J.:
debtors.
In these matters, there has been referred to the Court a
debtor's petition presented under S. 56 of the Bankruptcv Act
1966 by each of the debtors. The petitions have been referred
under subs. (7AA), as required by that subs., because the creditor's petition of Tony Blain Pty Limited was pending against the partnership of the debtors and against the
There are some problems in relation to the creditor's petition. In particular, the evidence filed suggests that the bankruptcy notice was not properly served upon the female debtor. There may also be a difficulty in relation to the compliance of the petition ltself with the rules. The first matter obviously would provide a very strong reason for giving a direction under S. 56(7AB)(a) in relation to the female debtor, and in the case of a partnership it is obviously desirable that the administration of each estate, so far as possible, be carried out by the same trustee.
There has been no suggestion from the creditor's representative that there is any particular matter which can be pointed to as indicating that the debtors should not become bankrupt upon their own petitions, and a perusal of the papers does not suggest to me that there is any such reason. In the circumstances, I think it is proper to give a direction under
S. 56 (7AB) (a) that the Registrar accept each of the debtors'
petitions, and I so direct.
true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of his I certify that this and the preceding page are a Honour Mr Justice Burchett.
Associate:
Date: 5 January 1993The debtors, who resided in Tasmania, did not appear. Solicitor for the Petitioning
Creditor: Mr G.R. Hear1 of
Messrs Aitken & MagneyDate of hearing: 5 January 1993
- AGLC
- Re Ernest John Summerfield & Cheryl Summerfield trading as East Coast Traders Ex Parte Tony Blain P/L trading as Acme T-shirts [1993] FCA 8
- Case
- [1993] FCA 8
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues centred around the validity of the debtors' petitions and the potential procedural errors in the creditor's petition. The court had to decide if there were sufficient grounds to accept the debtors' petitions despite the issues with the creditor's petition. The court also needed to consider the implications of having different trustees for the debtors' estates if the debtor's petitions were not accepted.
The court found that there were substantial issues with the creditor's petition, primarily regarding the improper service of the bankruptcy notice on Cheryl Summerfield. Furthermore, there was no indication from the creditor's representative or the court documents suggesting that the debtors should not be declared bankrupt based on their own petitions. Considering these factors, the court decided to direct the Registrar to accept the debtors' petitions under Section 56(7AB)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act. This decision ensured that both debtors' estates would be administered by the same trustee, which was deemed preferable for the management of the estates.
The court's final order was to direct the Registrar to accept the debtor's petitions presented by Ernest John Summerfield and Cheryl Summerfield, trading as East Coast Traders. The decision ensured the administration of both debtors' estates would be handled by the same trustee, facilitating a more cohesive and efficient process.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.