Re Equity Access Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation
Case
•
[1989] FCA 506
•15 Aug 1989
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Re Equity Access Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation [1989] FCA 506
[1989] FCA 506
15 Aug 1989
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case involves a dispute between the Australian Design Council, formerly known as the Industrial Design Council of Australia, and Peter Borello trading as Buccaneer Pools. The applicant, the Australian Design Council, alleged that the respondent, Borello, infringed upon its registered trade mark and falsely represented that his swimming pools had the endorsement or approval of the Council or were qualified by a design award. The Council sought injunctive relief, damages, and other orders. The legal issues the court was required to decide were whether Borello had breached the terms of the injunction made by consent and if so, whether a fine should be imposed for the contempt of court.
The court found that Borello had deliberately breached the injunction by continuing to use the Council's trade mark and suggesting the Council's approval or endorsement of his swimming pools. Although the breach was based on a misunderstanding, the court imposed a fine of $2,000 to underline the importance of prompt compliance with the orders of the court and the public interest element in this case. The court took into account the extenuating circumstances surrounding the breach which is otherwise of a deliberate character. The orders made by the court were that the respondent be restrained from publishing certain words in connection with the advertising of his swimming pools, be fined the sum of $2,000, and pay the applicant's costs including solicitor/client costs.
The court found that Borello had deliberately breached the injunction by continuing to use the Council's trade mark and suggesting the Council's approval or endorsement of his swimming pools. Although the breach was based on a misunderstanding, the court imposed a fine of $2,000 to underline the importance of prompt compliance with the orders of the court and the public interest element in this case. The court took into account the extenuating circumstances surrounding the breach which is otherwise of a deliberate character. The orders made by the court were that the respondent be restrained from publishing certain words in connection with the advertising of his swimming pools, be fined the sum of $2,000, and pay the applicant's costs including solicitor/client costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Trade Mark Infringement
-
Injunction
-
Contempt of Court
-
Compensatory Damages
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
RS Financial Pty Ltd ATF the Pro Group Trust v ProLend Solutions Management PTY. Ltd [2025] ATMO 102
Cases Citing This Decision
516
The Real Thing Food Supplements CC v Media Tag Pty Ltd
[2018] NSWCA 318
Opposition by Bluemont Pty Ltd to registration of trade mark application number 2364172 (class 22) for the trade mark –
[2025] ATMO 207
National Seniors Australia Ltd
[2025] ATMO 202
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
0