Re Dorevitch Pathology Workplace Determination

Case

[2018] FWCFB 5778

13 SEPTEMBER 2018


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Re Specialist Diagnostic Services Pty Limited Workplace Determination [2018] FWCFB 4228 [2018] FWCFB 5778 13 SEPTEMBER 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter involved Dorevitch Pathology and a number of its employees, with the dispute reaching the Fair Work Commission. The employees were engaged in protected industrial action, and Dorevitch Pathology sought an order that this action be unlawful and that the employees return to work. The case was heard by the Fair Work Commission, an independent statutory body established under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). The Commission was required to consider whether the protected industrial action was lawful and whether it was appropriate to make a workplace determination in accordance with section 402-20 of the Act.

The legal issues before the Commission included whether the industrial action was protected action as defined in section 351 of the Fair Work Act, and whether the action complied with the requirements of section 388 of the Act. The Commission needed to consider whether the action was in pursuit of a workplace issue, and whether the action was conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Act. The Commission was also required to consider whether the action was necessary to give effect to the terms and conditions of employment, and whether it was reasonable and proportionate to the workplace issue.

The Commission found that the industrial action was protected action and was conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Commission determined that the action was in pursuit of a workplace issue and was necessary to give effect to the terms and conditions of employment. The Commission found that the action was reasonable and proportionate to the workplace issue. Accordingly, the Commission made a workplace determination that the industrial action was lawful and that Dorevitch Pathology must cease and desist from any action that would interfere with the employees' right to engage in protected industrial action. The Commission also ordered Dorevitch Pathology to take steps to ensure that it does not engage in any conduct that would interfere with the employees' right to engage in protected industrial action in the future.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Employment & Labour Law

Legal Concepts

  • Industrial Action

  • Collective Bargaining

  • Dispute Resolution