Re Decimal Software Limited [No 2]
Case
•
[2018] FCA 2040
•13 December 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Re Decimal Software Limited [No 2] [2018] FCA 2040
[2018] FCA 2040
13 December 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of Re Decimal Software Limited [No 2] involved an application to approve a scheme of arrangement under section 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001. The dispute arose as a result of low voter turnout among the company's members despite the statutory majorities required for the scheme being met. The application was brought before the Federal Court of Australia.
The court was tasked with determining whether the scheme of arrangement should be approved despite the low turnout. Key legal issues included whether the statutory majorities were validly achieved and whether the low turnout warranted a departure from the usual requirements. Additionally, the court considered whether the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) had any objections to the scheme.
In reaching its decision, the court noted that although the voter turnout was low, the statutory majorities were achieved and ASIC had provided its 'no objection' letter. The court found that the statutory requirements had been met and that there were no objections from ASIC. Therefore, the court concluded that the scheme should be approved. The court made orders approving the scheme, exempting the plaintiff from certain compliance requirements, and directing the plaintiff to lodge a copy of the orders with ASIC.
The final orders included approval of the scheme of arrangement, exemption from compliance with certain sections of the Act, and a direction for the plaintiff to lodge an office copy of the orders with ASIC. These orders were made pursuant to the relevant sections of the Corporations Act and the Federal Court Rules 2011.
The court was tasked with determining whether the scheme of arrangement should be approved despite the low turnout. Key legal issues included whether the statutory majorities were validly achieved and whether the low turnout warranted a departure from the usual requirements. Additionally, the court considered whether the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) had any objections to the scheme.
In reaching its decision, the court noted that although the voter turnout was low, the statutory majorities were achieved and ASIC had provided its 'no objection' letter. The court found that the statutory requirements had been met and that there were no objections from ASIC. Therefore, the court concluded that the scheme should be approved. The court made orders approving the scheme, exempting the plaintiff from certain compliance requirements, and directing the plaintiff to lodge a copy of the orders with ASIC.
The final orders included approval of the scheme of arrangement, exemption from compliance with certain sections of the Act, and a direction for the plaintiff to lodge an office copy of the orders with ASIC. These orders were made pursuant to the relevant sections of the Corporations Act and the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Corporate Law & Governance
Legal Concepts
-
Scheme of Arrangement
-
Approval of Scheme
-
Exemption from Compliance
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Essential Metals Limited, in the matter of Essential Metals Limited (No 2) [2023] FCA 1306
Cases Citing This Decision
52
Re Vimy Resources Ltd [No 2]
[2022] WASC 257
Re Ozgrowth Ltd [No 2]
[2022] WASC 167
Re Bardoc Gold Ltd [No 2]
[2022] WASC 113
Cases Cited
9
Statutory Material Cited
1
Re Seven Network Ltd (No 3)
[2010] FCA 400
Re NRMA Ltd (No 2)
[2000] NSWSC 408