Re Buckingham
Case
•
[2016] VSC 757
•9 December 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Re Buckingham null [2016] VSC 757
[2016] VSC 757
9 December 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The beneficiaries of the estate of a deceased person brought a proceeding in the Supreme Court of Victoria against the executor of the estate. They sought financial information and an administration account for the estate. The beneficiaries also sought costs against the executor personally. The executor counterclaimed for costs against the plaintiffs. The executor also sought commission for their services as executor.
The legal issues the court was required to decide included whether the executor had provided adequate and timely financial information to the beneficiaries, whether the beneficiaries were entitled to an administration account for the estate, and whether the executor was entitled to a commission for their services.
The court held that the executor had failed to provide adequate and timely financial information to the beneficiaries, and therefore the beneficiaries were entitled to an administration account for the estate. The court also held that the executor was entitled to a commission for their services, but the amount was to be determined by the court. The court further held that the beneficiaries were entitled to costs against the executor personally, but the executor was not entitled to costs against the plaintiffs.
The court made orders for the executor to provide an administration account for the estate, for the executor to pay the beneficiaries' costs, and for the executor to be paid a commission for their services in an amount to be determined by the court.
The legal issues the court was required to decide included whether the executor had provided adequate and timely financial information to the beneficiaries, whether the beneficiaries were entitled to an administration account for the estate, and whether the executor was entitled to a commission for their services.
The court held that the executor had failed to provide adequate and timely financial information to the beneficiaries, and therefore the beneficiaries were entitled to an administration account for the estate. The court also held that the executor was entitled to a commission for their services, but the amount was to be determined by the court. The court further held that the beneficiaries were entitled to costs against the executor personally, but the executor was not entitled to costs against the plaintiffs.
The court made orders for the executor to provide an administration account for the estate, for the executor to pay the beneficiaries' costs, and for the executor to be paid a commission for their services in an amount to be determined by the court.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Succession Law
Legal Concepts
-
Administration of Estate
-
Executor's Commission
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Re Buckingham null [2016] VSC 757
Most Recent Citation
In the matter of the estate of Rajendran [2025] VSC 371
Cases Citing This Decision
30
Galea v Camilleri
[2023] NSWSC 206
Galea v Camilleri
[2023] NSWSC 206
In the matter of the estate of Rajendran
[2025] VSC 371
Cases Cited
21
Statutory Material Cited
0
Nolan v Collie
[2003] VSCA 39
Dimos v Skaftouros
[2004] VSCA 141