Re Bird, Alex Neville (as Trustee of the Estate of Yiangos Arcadiou, a bankrupt) Ex parte Pozzuto, Salvatore and Ors

Case [1980] FCA 12


CATCHWORDS

Bankruptcy A c t 1 9 6 6 ,

s.122

- payees having

f a i l e d t o n e g a t i v e t h e i n f e r e n c e s

set

o u t

i n s u b - s e c .

( 4 ) (c ) h e l d n o t p a y e e s i n

good

f a i t h ; h e l d , p a y m e n t v o i d a s a g a l n s t

t h e

t rustee

o f

t h e

es ta te o f

t h e b a n k r u p t .

RE:

A L E X

N E V I L L E

B I R D

( a s

T r u s t e e

Of t h e

E s t a t e

of YIANGOS

ARCADIOU,

a

bankrup t )

EX PARTE:

SALVATORE

POZZUTO,

GIOVAN'NI

NIGRO,

PASQUALE

NIGRO

and

ANGEL0

POZZUTO

SWEEXEY J.

19

D E C 3 I B E R

1 9 7 9

1 r

I N THE

PEDE3AL

COURT OF AUSTRALIA

GENERAL D I V I S I O N

Xo.

68 of

1977

BANKRUPTCY

D I S T R I C T OF

THE

STATE

OF

V I C T O R I A

RE:

ALEX

N E V I L L E

B I R D

(as T r u s t e e

of

t h e Es ta te Of

-

YIANGOS

ARCADIOU,

a

bankrup t )

EX PARTE:

SALVATODE

POZZUTO,

GIOVANNI

NIGHO,

PASQUALE

XIGRO

and

ANGEL9

POZZUTO

ORDER

JUDGE

MAKING

ORDER:

SWEENEY 3.

WHERE

MADE:

MELBOURNE

DATE OF ORDER:

1 9 DECEMBER 1979

THE

COURT

DECLARES

THAT:

The

payment

of

$ 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

made

by

t h e b a n k r u p t

t o

t h e

r e sponden t s

on

2 9

September

1 9 7 6 is v o i d

as

a g a l n s t

t h e a p p l i c a n t a s t r u s t e e

of

t h e

p r o p e r t y

of

t h e

b a n k r u F t a n d o r d e r s

t h a t

t h e r e sponden t s pay

t o the

a p p l i c a n t t h e

sum of

$10,000.00

toge thcr w l t h h l s

taxed costs of a n d

l n c i d e n t a l

t o

t h e a p p l i c a t i o n ,

l n c l u d i n g

r e s e r v e d

costs,

such costs

t o Se

t a x e d ,

i f

n o t

a g r e e d .

L l b e r t y

t o app ly

1 s

r e s e r v e d

t o

e l t h e r

p a r t y .

I N THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

GENERAL DIVISION

No. 68

of

1 9 7 7

BANKRUPTCY DISTPTCT OF THE

STATE

O F

V I C T O R I A

Re

: ALEX

NEVILLE B I R D

(As T r u s t e e of

t h e e s t a t e

of

YIANGOS ARCADIOU

a

bankrup t )

A p p l l c a n t

and

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

C.?..

Sweeney J .

19 December,

1 9 7 9

I n

t h l s a p p l i c a t i o n , a s

amended

by

l e a v e ,

t h e

a p p l i c a n t

seeks

t h e

f o l l o w l n g d e c l a r a t l o n s a n d o r d e r s :

" ( a )

That

payment

made

by

t h e

b a n k r u p t

t o the

Responclent

on

the

2 9 t h

September,

1 9 7 6

f o r

$ 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

1 s

vold

a s a g a l n s t

t h e a p p l i c a n t

as

T r u s t e e o f

t h e p r o p e r t y

of

t h e b a n k r c p t

as belng

payment

havlnc;

t h e e f f e c t o f g l v l n g

t h e r e s p o n ? e r . t

a

p r e f e r e n c e p r l o r l t y o r a d v a n t a g e o v e r

c r e d l t o r s

of

the banlcrdpt or

alternatively

by

v i r t u e

of

t h e B a n k r u p t c y o f

t h e

Bankrupt havlng been

deemed

t o h a v e

r e l a t i o n b a c k t o d z t e

t h e

20th day

of

September ,

1376

on

whlch

da

te

the

b a n k r u p t

g a v e

n o t l c e

t o

some of h:s

c r e d l t o r s namely

Gubbatta

Nonnnees

P t y .

L t d .

t r a d i n g a s

H l y h e t t

Tlmbzr

Co.

Tasmanlan

Board

Ih l l s

L t d . , B e n e f i c l a 1

F inance

Corpord t lcn

L t2 .

and

Al l la i lce

Acceptance

Corpora

t

lor

L ;ml tcd ,

tha t

he

has

suspen?ed

cr 1 s a t o u t

t o s u s p e n d

payment of h i s

d s b ~ s .

( b )

An

o r d e r

t h a t

t h e

r e s p o n d e n t

p a y

t o

t h e

a p p l i c a n t

t h e

sum

of

$ 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 . "

. .

. / 2

2 .

I n t h e i r n o t l c e o f i c t e n t l o n t o o p p o s e t h e

a p p l i c a t i o n ,

as

amended

by

l e a v e ,

t h e

r e s p o n d e n t s

relied

upon t h e following grounds :

"l.

THAT

the Responden t s and a l l o f

t

hem were

payees

i n good

f a l t h a n d f o r v a l u a b l e

c o n s i d e r a t i o n a n d

I n

t n e

o r d l n a r y c o u r s e

of

b u s i n e s s , w i t h l n

t h e m e a n l n g o f S . l 2 2 ( 2 ) ( a )

of

the Bankrup tcy

A c t

1 9 6 6 .

2 .

THAT

the payment was not

made

under

such

c l r c u m s t a n c e s

a s

t o l e a d

t o

t h e

i n f e r e n c e

t h a t

t h e R e s p o n d e n t s o r a n y o f

t h e m

knew,

or

h a d r e a s o n t o s u s p e c t

-

(a ) t h a t YIANGOS ARCADIOU was

unable

t o

p a y h i s d e b t s

as

they

became

due

from

h i s own money:

and

I

(b) t h a t t h e e f f e c t

of

the

payment

would

l

be

t o g l v e

t h e R e s p o n d e n t s o r a n y

of

them

a

p r e f e r e n c e , p r l o r l t y o r

a d v a n t a g e o v e r o t h e r c r e d i t o r s

-

so t h a t t h e Respcndents

and

all o f

t h e m r e t a l n

t h e

r l g h t s o f p a y e e s

I n

good

f a l t h ,

a n d a r e

n o t e x c l u d e d f r o m t h a t s t a t u s

by

t h e o p c r a t i o n

of

S . 1 2 2 ( 4 ) ( c ) o f

t he Bankrup tcy

Act

1 9 6 6 .

3 .

THAT

the pa l a l en t

so

nade

i s r i o t

l n v a l i d a t e d

( a )

t h e

t r a n s a c t i o n

t o o k p l a c e b e f o r e

t h e

d a t e on whlch

YIAXGOS ARC>.DIOU

became

a

bankrup t ;

(b)

the

Respondents

and

any

of

then hac? no

n o t l c e , a t

t h e tlme

o f

t h e

t r a n s a c t l o n

4

of

t h e

p r e s c n t a t l o n o f

a

p e t l t l o n

4

a g a l n s t YIANGDS APCirDIOU

: and

(c ) t h e

t r a n s a c t l o n

a s

111 yood

f n l t h

a n d

1

i n t h c o r d i n a r y

cowsc

o f b u s m e s s

-

so

t h a t

t h e

R e s p o n d e n t s a r e e n t l t l e d

t o

r e l y

o n t h e v a l l d l t y o f

t h e

t r a n s a c t l o n , w h l c h

Was

a

payment

t o

a n y o r a l l o f

them

a s creditors

because o f t he

provisions

c o n t a l n c d

I n

S -123 (1)

of

the Bankruptcy Act

1 5 6 6 . I'

. .

. / 3

3 .

Mr

J .S .

S t e v e n s o n ,

c o u n s e l

f o r

t h e

r e s p o n d e n t s ,

s a i d t h a t t h e i r

sole

answer

t o

t h e

case

based

upon

s.122

of

the Bankrup tcy

A c t

1 9 6 6

was

t h a t , w i t h i n

t h e m e a n i n g

o f t h a t s e c t l o n t h e y

were

payees

In

good

f a i t h a n d f o r

v a l u a b l e c o n s i d e r a t l o n a n d i n

t h e

o r d l n a r y c o u r s e

of

b u s i n e s s .

M r I r l i c h t ,

who

a p p e a r e d

f o r

t h e

a p p l i c a n t ,

c o n c e d e d

t h a t The sole answer made

t h e y

were

p a y e e s f o r v a l u a b l e c o n s l d e r a t l o n .

by

t h e

r e s p o n d e n t s

t o

t h e

case

based upon s .123 of

the

A c t was

t h a t :

1.

t h e

t r a n s a c t i o n

t o o k

p l a c e

o

n

o

r

b e f o r e

t h e d a t e

on wh ich

the deb to r

became

a

bankrup t ;

2 .

t h e

p e r s o n ,

o t h e r

t h a n

t h e

d e b t o r ,

w l t h

whom

It

took

p l a c e , d l d n o t ,

a t t h e

t l m c

o f t h e p r e s e n t a t l o n o f

t r a n s a c t l o n ,

h a v e

no t l ce

o f

t h e

a

p e t l t l o n a g a l n s t t h e

d e b t o r ;

a n d

3.

t h e t r a n s a c t i o n was

I n gngd

f d l t h

a n d

i n t h e o r d l n a r y c o u r s e

of

b a l n e s s .

M r

I r l l c h t c o n c e d e d t h e f i r s t

two

p r o p o s l t l o n s b u t n o t

t h e

t h l r d .

Under

S. 1 2 2 ( 3 )

t h e

bu rden o f p rov ing tha t t hey

were

p a y e e s I n g o o d f a l t h a n d

I n

t h e

o r d l n a r y c o u r s e o f

b u s l n e s s

l i e s

upon

t h e

r e s p o n d c n t s .

S e c t l o n

1 2 2 ( 4 ) ( c ) ? r o v l ? e s

t h a t

fo r t n e purposes of

s.122:

" a c r e d j t o r s h a l l b e

deemed

n o t t o

be

a

pu rchase r ,

payee

o

r

eccumbrance r

In

good

f a l t h If

t h ?

c o n v e y a n c e ,

t r a n s f e r ,

c h a r s e ,

payment

or

o b l l q a t l o n

was

c x e c u t e d ,

mzdc

or

i n c u r r e d u n d e r

s u c h

c l r c u m s t a n c e s a s

t o

lead

t o t h e l n f e r e n c e t h a t t h e c r e d l t o r

knew,

o r h a d r e a s o n

t o s u s p e c t -

(i)

t h a t

t h e d e b t o r

was

unable

t o pay

h i s d e b t s as

t h e y became

duc from

h i s OW-I money; and

(11) c h a t

t h e

e f f e c t

o

f

t h e

c o n v e y a n c e ,

t r a n s f e r ,

c h a r g e ,

p a y m n t

o r

o b l i g a t l o n w o u l d b e t o g l v c

h l m

a

p r e f e r e n c e ,

p l c r l t y o r

a d v a n t a g e

o v e r o t h e r c r c d ~

':or$;. "

I .

4 .

Under

S . 1 2 3 ( 2 )

t he bu rden

of

p r o v i n g t h a t

t h e

t r a n s a c t i o n

was

i n

good

f a i t h a n d l n t h e o r d i n a r y c o u r s e

o f b u s i n e s s

l i e s

upon

t h e

r e s p o n d e n t s .

S e c t i o n

1 2 3 ( 3 )

p r o v l d e s :

"For

the

purposes

o

f

sub-sec t lon

(1) of

t h i s s e c t i o n ,

a

t r a n s a c t l o n s h a l l n o t b e

deemed

n o t

t o have been

In

good

fa l th and

i n t h e o r d i n a r y c o u r s e

of

b u s m e s s

by

r e a s o n o n l y t h a t , a t t h e

time

of

t h e

t r a n s a c t i o n ,

t h e p e r s o n ,

o t h e r

t h a n

t h e

d e b t o r , w l t h

whom

i t

took p lace had

n o t l c e of

the conunlsslcn

of

an

a c t

of

bankruprcy

by

t h e d e b t c r .

I'

It was

common

g r o u n d

t h a t n o n e o f

t h e r e s p o n d e n t s

h a d n o t i c e

of

the commisslon

of

an ac t of bankruptcy by

t h e

bankrup t .

M r

S tevenson conceded

tha t

the

bankrupt

had

on

2 0

September

1 9 7 6 committed

t h e a c t

of

b a n k r u p t c y a l l e g e d

i n

t h e a p p l i c a t i o n a n d

t h a t , p m s u a n t

t o

t h e p r o v l s l o r l s

of

s .115 ,

t h e b a n k r u p t c y

of

t h c b a n k r u p t s h a l l b e d e e m 2

t o

h a v e r e l a t i o n

Dack

t o , a n d

t o h a v e

commenced

a t t h a t t i n e ,

so

t h a t , p u r s u a n t

t o

t h e p r o v - s l o n s

of

s.116,

t h e

su-n of

$lO,OCO.OO

pa ld on

2 9

September

1 9 7 6 was

p r o p e r t y d 1 v l s r b l c

among

h i s c r e d l t o r s , u n l e s s

h l s

c l l e n t s

s v c c e e d e d

12 r e l h t l o n

t o

t h e g r o u a d s

of

o p p o s l t l o n s e t o u t

l n

t h e l r n o t l c r

The

e v i d e n c e

showed

tha t

f rom

September

1 9 7 3

t h e

r e s p o n d e n t s ,

a s

c o n c r e t e r s , c a r r l e d

o u t

c o n t r a c t s

f o r

t h e

bankrupt

th rouqhout

t h e bz l ance

cf

1 9 7 3 zim2

1 9 7 1 wlt.1

l n c r e a s i n g

f r e q u e r . c y , u n t l l

t h e y

here

devo t lng

abou t

4s:

~f

t h e l r worklnc; t m e t o h i s J D ~ S . [Intll the

end

of 1 3 7 4 t h e

bankrup t

was

d e s c r i b e d

as prom2t

1 1 1 rndlclncj

pa.yxer:ts.

S a l v a t o r e P o z z u t o ' s n a r r a t l v e o f

t h e r e s p o ? ? e n t ' s

d e a l l n g s w i t h

Lhe

bankrupt

then

cont lnue2

as

f o i l o w s :

. . .

/5

5.

" 8 .

THAT

d u r i n g t h e y e a r

1975 I

presented

lnvolces t o t h e s a l d

YIANGOS

ARCP.DIOL

fo r payment whcn I saw h m on work s l tes ,

r a t h e r more some occasions t h e sale YIANGOS ARCADIOU

f r e q u e n t l y

t h a n

b e f o r e ,

b e c a u s e

of

h l s

i n c r e a s l n g

s l o w n e s s

I n payment.

On

stated

t h a t h e c o u l d n o t p a y t h e f u l l a m o u n t

immedla te ly ,

and

on

o

thcr

occas

ions

the

s a i d

YIANGOS

ARCADIOU

s t a t e d t h a t h e c o u l d

no t pay

- -

a t a l l f o r

a

f2w

d a y s , b e c a u s e

of

d e l a y s

i n s e t t l l n q s a i e s

a f -h i s p r o p e r t i e s .

It was s a i d YIANGOS ARCADIOI; had a great d e a l of

a p p a r e n t

t o ne,

h o w e v e r ,

t h a t

t h e

v a l u a b l e

rea l

e s t a t e whlLh

was

s e l l l n g

well.

9 .

THAT

as 1 9 7 5 drew

t o a

c lose,

t h e s e

e x c u s e s

o f t h e s a l d

YIAXGOS

A?.CADIOU

f o r non-

payment

became

more

f r e q u e n t .

On

some

occasions, I would go t o h l s

home a t

4

Glengala

Road,

Sunshlne

t o

p r e s e n t

l n v o l c e s

f o r

p a y m e n t .

O c c a s l o n a l l y ,

t h e r e

were

o t h e r people who . :o rked

for

h

lm

there ,

a l s o

rcqucs t ing

yayment .

Sometmes,

he

would

t e l l u s aboLt

slow

s e t t l e m e n t

of

sales

of

h l s ? r o p c r t i i s , a n d t h a t

we

would

have

t o be

s a t l s f l e d by

p a r t i a l payment

f o r a r e a s s u r e d ne,

few

days ,

or

u n t l l

t he nex t week .

On

occasions

whcn

he d ldn '

t

pay , he a lways

a n d o t h e r s

who

mlght

be

w l t h

me,

t h a t i-.is

b u s m e s s ::as

sound.

Indeed ,

It was

o b v l o u s

t o me, 2nd I presume t o

anybody

~1115 m g h t be

p r e s e i l t ,

t h 6 t h l s

residence ;;as

of

a

s u r c r l o r n a t u r e ,

and

t h a t It was

f u l l o f

3:;

k l n d s of

va luab lc

goods.

Ne% bG:llcllncj s:;,;>lles

w e r e

s t o r e <

on t h e YIANGOS .X?C.;DIOIJ

p r e m s e s ,

~n profusion.

The said

a l s o had a new ca r , I

b e l i e v e t h a t

It

G J ~ S

a

Sord

"ka i r l aL?" .

1 0 .

THAT

t h e s z l d YJANCOS

.-.SC>LlIOU

hcc1,

s l n c e

t h e b s g i n n l n g nlaterlals.

of

lY75, ~ : O I L

bu l id lc~q

I n a

p z r t of

t h e

"Col l ie P z v s i g

Company's' ' business ;,r-.nlses

whlch :~;2 wcre

no t u s lnc j . b u i l d l n g

Th

l

s

a ; : pxcn t

ab1 l l t ; r

t o

Surchase

materials

h e

7:as

n o t g o l n q t o

use

immedlatelv

.'

re:nforccl

ITV

-

oclnior.

-

t h a t t h e

s a l d YIANC-OS

__

A R C \ I J ~ O L I X I S

a

weal thy

man,

who

was wel l aDle t o pcy d.11 hls debLs

when

he

wanted

t o .

11.

THAT toward

the

end

o f 1 9 7 5 .

I

was

t o l d bv

$ 5 0 0 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 .

T h l s

r - e l q t o r c e d

my

own

o p l n l o n

t h a t t h e s a l d

YIANCOS

;~I.CAD:OU's

f a l l u r e t o

make

p rompt paym~nt

to

mc

a n d o t h e r c r e d l t o r s

was

duc

t o

w l l f u l b e n a v l o u r o n h l s

p a r t ,

r a t h c r

t:.m

a n y

L n a b l l l t y

t o pay.

A t

t h e

. .

./6

6.

e n d of

Ncvember

ar.d

t h e b e g ~ n n l n g of

December

1975,

I,

t o g e t h e r w i t h

t h e

o

ther

Respondents

herc ln , worked

on

some of W e r r l b e e c o n s t r u c t i o n

t h e s a i d

YIANGOS

A R C A D I O U ' s

s i t e s ,

and

many

o t h e r p e r s o n s

were

working

there:

nobody

was

compla in ing abou t no t be lng pa ld .

12.

THAT i n December of 1975 J met t h e

s a l d

YIANGOS ARCADIOU and to ld hlm t h a t I

wan ted

the "Collle Pavlng

Company's"

invoices

t o

b e p a l d b e f o r e C h r l s t m a s ,

a n d t h e s a i d

YI,iNGOS

AXCADIOU

s t a t e d

t o

me

t h a t t h e r e

would

~2

n o t r o u b l e a b o u t

t h a t .

However,

no

money was recelve2.

I n s p i t e of

t h l s , I

and

t he

o the r

Responden t s

h e r e i n a t t e n d e d .

a

C h r l s t m a s p s r t y

q lven

by

t h e s a i d

YIANGOS

ARCADJOU

f o r

t h e S e o p l e

who worked

for him

a t

th?

Sunsh ine He i sh t s

-

Hotel ,

Sunshlne.

Many

people were

p r e s e n t

a t th i s l av l sh fu r . c t lo r . , and nobody excep t t h e o t h e r R e s p o n d e n t s h e r e l n a n d m y s e l f ,

a p p e a r e d t o

me

t o De

uriahppy

a b o u t t h e

non-payment

of

a c c o u n t s o i i ing t o them,

or

a n y t h l n g

else.

1 3 .

THAT d u r i n g

t h e

ho1id.aj.s t h a t I arc!

t h e

o the r Respcnden t s

t ook

l runed la t e ly

a f t e r

C k r i s t m s 1 9 7 5 ,

we

d r c l d e d n o t

t o ~ o r k

f o r

t h e s a i d

YIA?!GOS

A X C A D I O t i

I n t h e f u t u r e ,

u n t i l h e p a i d

u s

all

thr3

m m e y

t h a t h e

owed

u s . I it would pct an end

p r o p o s e d

t h l s

c c t l o n

b e c a u s e

1

t hdugh t

to what I c o n s i d e r e ?

t c

be

so~ne f l n a n c l a l

t r l c k s

I d l d n o t unde--+---

L > d.-d.

14.

THAT l n February of

1 9 7 6 t n e s a l d Y?Y<COS

ARCADIOU

ce l e shone6 I ~ C

anJ t o l d me c:lat

i f

-

t h e s a l d "Ccllle Pav1r.q Compny" wo;ll?

do a

small

j o b on

a

proper:?

a t C r a l g i e b u l n ,

he

would

pay

off

a

l a r q e

:>zr t o f t h e a r c u ~ t

owlng

t o the

sal6

" C c 1 l l e Pcvlng

CoE,?zny".

We

d i d t h a t ] o b

s t a

:air and rezsc.&le

pr lcc

of

$1.

:7

.00,

an2

the

sald

YIA?:GGS

--.--c

-

ARCADIOU s e a t u s a cheque 13 t h c dmodnt of

$5,000.00

a lnas t

m m e C l a t e l y .

---

1 5 .

THAT In >!arch

~~

of 1 9 7 6 I i i e n t t o scc

the s a d

YIANGOS ARCADICILI and

to ld . h lm

tha t

we

necdeci

mvncy t o pay our

t axes .

The s a l d Yi;NGG!;

ARCAbIOU

s a i d t h a t

I

s h o u l d n o t

worry,

tnzk

hc coul.1 t h e s e t t l e m e n t

eas l ly pay tnc amount due t o u s on

of

che

sa le of

a

p r o p e r t y d u e

on

9 t h A p r l l ,

1 9 7 6 .

dnd

t h a t h e

would

pay

any interest c t~arqe

;ncui - red .

I

t o l d

t h e

s a i d CGLIN EO33

3TrC4;:I

0:

t h l s c o n v c r s s h o n ,

--__-

and

on

, I S ~

Xarzh

1 9 7 6 i.e

wrote a

l e t te r t o

t h e

s a i d YIANGOS

A I K A D I O U whlch

I

s l g n e d and

p o s t e d . I'

. .

. / 7

.

l .

That

l e t t e r r e a d a s

follows:

"We

r e f e r

t o

t h e b a l a n c e o u t s t a n d i n g i n

your accoun t w i th

us,

amount ing

to

$17686.85

B t t h e

time

o f w r i t i n g .

We

acknowledge your

l a t c s t p romise

of

a

r emi t t ance on

or

b e f o r e 9 t h A p r r l , b u t ,

a s w e

have had

t o r a l s e f i n a n c e t o c o v e r

pressing commltments

w e

now

f o n m l l y a d v i s e

you t h a t w e must now

impose

an

i n t e re s t cha rge

a t t h e

ra te

of

1 0 % p .a .

on

the

amount

o u t s t a n d i n g o n 9 t h . A p r i l n e x t , u n t i l

f i n a l l y

l i q u i d a t e d .

T h l s i n t e r e s t

w l l l b e c a l c u l a t e d o n

a

d a i l y

b a s l s , a n d o n

t h e p r e s e n t b a l a n c e o u t s t a n d l n g

would

amount

t o approx lma te ly

$ 7 .

pe r

day . "

" 1 6 .

THAT

s h o r t l y

a f t e r

I

senL t h e said l e t t e r

d a t e d 31st P:z.rcn

1375, T n e t t h e s a i d

Y I A X G O S

A F C A D I I I U

&1.2

he

c o n f l r n e d .

t h a t h e

-.

would

pay

tale i n i e r e s t .

A f t e r

t h a t

I cilrl

n o t a p p r o a c h

t h e s a l d

Y I A N G O S

AT,CA.DIOti

so

f r e q u e n t l y

f o r

p a y m e n t ,

b e c a u s e

I

ccn5idsred.

t h a t

w e

h a d a n

I n t e r e s t - b e a r l n g

i n v e s t r c n t .

However, I and

t he

o thc r

Responden t s

were

s t i l l de termined

not

t o work

f o r t h c s a l d

Y I A N G O S

ARCA9IOI'

a g a l n , u n t l l

w e

had

recc lved

payncnt

i n

f u l l o f

t h e

a m o u n t

owlncj

t o u s .

1 7 .

THAT

towards

t he

e n d

o f

A p r i l

1 9 7 6

we

d l d .

w o r r a t

a

p r o ; > e r t y i n W e r r l b c e a t

t h e

r e q u c s t

o f t h e s a i d

Y I A X G O S

Z X C i i D I O U

on

t h c

promlse

t h a t

a

la rge paymcnt

o i

p a s t d u e a c c o d r t s

would

be

forthcomu1g

If

w e

< i d

so;

b u t

K O

paymcnt

was

recelvcd.

b t h &

b u s i n e s s .

I

t n e n observed- t h a t t h c r ?

were

many

peop le work ing

the re , mc lu2 lKq

s3me who were d o l n ~

c o n c r e t n g I : O L ~ . T

~

P

development

of

t h o s e p r o p c r t l e s a p p e a r e d

t

o

m e

t o be 2 roceed ing no rma l ly .

-

-

p r e p a r e d

t o so

some

work

f;r

k l l r n .

rcpLlt-2

t h a t we

werc

u n w l l l l n q t o

work

f o r

h l m u x l e s s

w e were

p a l d

t h e f u l l amount

of

money

owlng

t o us;

t o t h l s

h e

a n s w e r e d

t h a t

i f

I wcnt t o

t h e

R e a l E s t a t e

f l r m

of

T r i b e

and Assoc la t e s

i n Sunshlne It t h a t WC

t h e

n e x t n l g h t ,

h e w o u l d

s e e

t c l

were

p a l d .

. .

./a

:

8 .

2 0 .

THAT

I

proceeded

t o t h e

p r e m l s e s

of

t h e

f i r m of

T r l b e a n d

Associates as

~~~

~

~

~~

i n s t r u c t e d

by

t h e s a d

YIANGOS

A R C h D I O U

.

a n d

t h e r e son P!IILIP

I met t h e

s a l d

Y l a n g o s

Arcacl?ou's

ARCADIOU.

The

s a i d P H I L I P

-_

ARCADIOLI

t h e n s a v e

m e

a

c h c a u e

l n

t h e amount

o f

$lG, 0 0 0 . 0 0

which

had been

w r l t t e n o u t by

h lm,

bQt

s lnr .ed

DY

t h e s a l d

YIANGOS AKCADIOU;

it

was

q u l t e u s u a l .

t h a t

t h e c h e q u e s

I

r e c e l v e d

Erom

t he sa ld YIAliGOS ARCADIOU

were

p r e p a r e d

i o r

his signature by

t h e s a l d

PHILIP ARCADIOU.

I a s k e d

t h e

s a l d

P H I L I P

ARCADIOU

w h e r e

t h e S a l a n c c o f

t h e

money

owing

t o u s

was,

a n d h e r e p l i e d t h a t

we

would

g e t It would n o t s tart work

t h e n e x t wee:;.

I

t h e n s a l d t h a t we

u n t l l a l l the money due

t o "Co l l l e Paving Company"

had

beer

.

pald,

and

t h e s a l d

P H I L I P

ARC,\DIOU

r e p l l e d t h a t

t he re

was

p l e n t y of

m o x y ,

arid

t h a t e v e r y b o d y

was

b e l n g

pald.

2 1 .

THAT

t h e

b a l a n c e

d u e

t o

" C o l l l e

P a v i n g

Company"

was

n e v e r

p a l d ,

a n d

t h e

"Co l l l e

Tavlng Company(" neve r d l d work

f o r t h e

sald

YIANGOS

ARCADIOU

a g d l n .

2 2 . -

THAT

I

c o n t l n u e d

t o

t e l e p h o n e

t h e

s a l d

YIANGOS

A R C A D I O U from tlme

t o tlme,

dccus lng

--

him

of

u n f a i r r e s s I.? t h a t h e had

n o t p : ~ ?

t h e s a l d

"Col l ie P a v l n g Conpary"

lr, full ;vhen

he had. p a l d

o f f

h l s

o t h e r

c r e d l t o r s .

T!Ie

s a l d YIAXGOS A3C;UlOi:

cont lnued. t o qlxJ-e

-

various escuses f o r non-payment.

Xcver'~k,eless,

I w a s astonished :;hen

a

"Kot lce of 1 :ee t lnc"

Under

cross-examinat lon

on

h l s a f f i d a v - t S a l v a t o r e

Pozzu

to

conceded

tha t he

m u s t

have

known

of

t h e b a n k r u p t ' s

f a i l u r e t o make

pronlpt

payment

t o other

c r e d l t o r s when

he

r e f e r r e d

i n p a l a g r a p h

11

t o h i s " € a l l u r e

t o make

prom?t

payment

t o me

a n d

o t h e r

c r e d l t o r s " .

O c c a s l o n a l l y

whcn

h e c a l l e d a t

t h e b a n k r u p r ' s

home

t o present

l n v o i c e s for

payment

there were

o t h e r people

who

worked

f o r hlm

a l s o

r e q u c s t l n g p a y m e n t .

The

. .

. /g

9.

bankrup t

made

f r e q u e n t p r o m i s e s

t o

pay h lm bu t b roke h i s

promises.

He

had never r e q u e s t e d

a n y

o t h e r

debtor

t o pay

i n t e re s t on

unpaid

accounts

a n d

t h e r e s p o n d a n t s

t.ad

neve r

had another debtor whose account

w d s

ove raue

fon

any:hlng

l i k e t h e

time

t h e b a n k r u p t

owed

them rnoney.

M r C o l i n Brown

made

a n a f f l d a v l t I n which he

set

o u t

t h e accountancy

services

whlch he

rendered

t o

t h e

r e sponden t s .

HIS

a f f l d a v l t

c o n t l n u e d

as

follows:

"7 .

THAT

u n t l l t h e

e n d

of 1974 It appea red

t o m e

t h a t t h e s a i d

Y I A N G O S

ARCADIOU

was

pavlnq 1nvo;ces

w l t h i n a

few days

of the- tine when I prepared

them.

-

8 .

THI.T

on

1 4 t h

J a n u a r y

1 9 7 5

t h e

s a l d

SALVATORE POZZil?'3 gzve ne 2 cheque 15

t h e a m o u t

of

$ 2 ~ O O O . O L ? h?

hzd

r ece lved

from

t h e s a i d

YJ:XSOS

h R C , d I O U ,

t o

p r o c e s s .

T h l s d l s t u r b e d

me,

bzcause

l t u p s e t

t h e

system whereby

I

could

see v h a t l n v o l c c s

had been e x p l a l n e d

pa id .

The

s a ld

SAL'JhTORE

;OZZUTO

t o ne

t h a t t h e

said

YIhNciS

A R C h D I O U had

t o l d t : lm

t h a t ne

had

a

temporayy

shor taqe

of cash ,

due

t o a

d e l a y

i n s e t t l i n g a

sa ic of

r ea l e s t a t e ;

Zur ing

t h e n e x t

month,

p2)'xerrt

r\7db nade

I n 2n

amount

suf f lc? 'enL

t o b r i n g

t h e a c c o u n t b a c k

t o 1ts

u s u a l cur len t

status.

~.

a n d o b s 2 r v e d t h a t

t h e r e

were

s e v e r a l

thousand

fee t

of

a r o h l t r a v e s

s t o r e d ? , ? e r e

On

e n q u l r y ,

I

was

mformed

t ha t

t hey

be lonqsd t o t h e sald Y1AN';OS

ARCADICI:.

Over

t h e n e x t

few months,

t h i s accumulatidrl cf

a r c h l t r a v e s b u l l t

L:?

t o

accu:

1 0 0 , 0 0 0

f e e t .

I knew from a y erpc'r;rncc :E and ex:;osure

t o tile

b u i l d 1 n 5

Lradr

a t t h a t tlme

t h a t

s u c h a r c h i t r a v e s

\;?re

worth

about

. l $ C

p e r

foo t ,

so

t h a t 1 0 0 , 0 0 0

fee t would

be

wort!l

about

$18,000.00,

and

r e a d l l y s a l e a b l e .

A t about

t h e e~:d of

1 9 7 6 or

t h e b e g l n 2 l n q

of

1 9 7 7

I

f u r t h e r o b s e r v ? d

t h a t

about

1 0 new

washing

I rzshlnes

h'??tl

Leen

s t o r e d on

t k e

b u s i n e s s uremses

of

t h e

"Co l l l c Pavlnq

Company" ,-

ancl aga1.l

I was

Informed. t h a t t h e y

be longed

t o

t h e

s a l d

YIANGOS

A R C A D I O 5 .

T h l s

s tor inq of

va luable

qoods on

t h e p r e m i s e s

of

t h e "Collie Pavlng

C&qxmy"was

2 f ac to r whlch

he lped

t o conf i rn my

b e l ~ e f t h a t t h e s a l d

Y I A N G O S

ARCADIOL' - was

s o l v e n t

at

a l l

tlmes.

. . .

/ l 0

1 0 .

THAT u n t l l August

of

1975

payment

from

t h e sa3.d YIANGCS ARCADIOU was slower

t h a n

it

h a d b e e n

i n

1 9 7 4 ,

b u t

t h e

maximum d e l a y I n payment was well under

6 0

d a y s p u r c h a s e

of

t h e a v e r a g e o f

b u s i n e s s

be ing

done,

and

i n vlew of

t h e

s i z e

of

t h e a c c o u n t a n d

t h e

tlme

it had

been

runnlng ,

and

my

h l q h o p l n l o n

of

t h e

wor th of

t h e s a l d YIANGOS ARCz.DIOU,

I

was

n o t

a t

a l l c o n c e r n e d t h a t t h e s a l d

YIANGOS

ARCADIOU might n o t b e a b l e

t o

p a y h i s d e b t s .

11.

THAT i n August of

1975

the

palment

of

" r o u n d

f l g u r c "

a m o u n t s r a t h e r

t h a n e x a c t

i nvo ice

amounts

r e s u r e d . b u t

t h e s a l d

SALVATORE

I-OZZUTO

e s ? l a l n e d t o

ne

t h a t

t h e s a i d

YIANGOS 4RCACIC.L' had ~ n l d

h111 cf

s l i g h t

l l q u l d i t ' : p r o b l e . n s

d.:e

to

d e l a y s

i n s e t t l i n g sales- of properties,

and i

was

s a t l s f l e d w i t h t h a t e x p l a n a t l o n .

1 2 .

THAT c n

s e v e r a l

f l c c a s i o n s

d u r l n g

1 9 7 4

and

1 9 7 5 I

went

t o c o n s t r u c c l o n

s l tes

t o sec

t h e salcl SALVATORE PO3ZVTO when some

matter had a r i sen w:llcI1

i wished t o d l s c u s s

w l t h

h m .

On

sone of

those o c c a s i o n s

I

saw

Impressed-by

h is obvi (3us encrTy

an6

d i l v e ,

a n d t h l s

a?dec? EO ny confidence 11'1 h111 whlch

l a s t e d

; n t o

1 9 7 7 .

13 .

TAAT

I

t h o u q h t

i t

d g p r o p r i a t e

t o

con:lr?.

t h e

-

f a v o u r a b l e jxpressicn I

h26 formed oi such a

t h e b u i 1 d l r . q

t r a d e ,

a n d

who

I

c o n s i d c r

t o

t-.

most

r c s u t a ; r l e ,

w h a t

,i?s

their

oplr,:on

o i

t h e sala

YIKJGOS

i ! j . C z d I @ U .

92

t h e

o c c z s l o i l s

-.

- v-

whzn I made such

rnc-ulr- les

in

1975

and

:97G,

I

was

r e a s s u r e d by

t k c r e p l l e s

I

received.

11.

THAT no dellnc!uency

I n payment

whlch

I

c o n s i d e r e d s e - 1 o u s

,JTclrrecl

u i l t i l

the

ecd

of

1975, whon

thc

sL id SIAN'XS A R C h D T O U ' s

f a l l u r c t o make a s substanti?. l

a pay;n?nt as

had

bcen

p r o m i s e s

i n DGcember causec me some

alarm.

However, I {.a5 once a q a l n

r e a s s u r e d

n o t o n l y by

my

own

e n ~ l u ~ r l e s , b u t a l s o

h;

the

Responden t s

hc r t , i n ,

who

a p s e a r e d

t o

be

c o n v i n c e d

t h a t

t h e

s a id YIAKJC-OS ARCAI!IOU

-

was

n o t

in

s e r l O u s

f l n a n c l a l d i f i i c u l t i e s .

. .

.

/l1

15.

THAT ear ly i n 1976 the

Respondents

h e r e l n

t o l d

me

o f t h e i r d e t e r m l n a t l o n n o t

t o

work

fo r t h e s a l d

YIAMGOS

ARCADIO'J u n t i l

h e h a d p a l d o f f

t h e

amount

due t o thcm;

.

it was thought

by

me t h a t

t h e

payment

he

c~u1 .d dell

a f f o r d c o u l d b e f o r c e d o u t

of

him i n t h i s way.

1 6 .

THAT

I n March

of

1 9 7 6

It

became

apparent

t h a t

t h e R e s p o n d e n t s h e r e l n w o u l d b e

u n a b l e

t o pay

a l l of

t h e l r p r o v l s l o n z l

income

t a x 2ue on

3 1 s t March

1 9 7 6 u n l e s s

t h e s a i d

YIANGOS

ARCADIOU p a l d o f f

m e

amount

t h a t h e

owed

t o

t h e " C o l l l e P a v l n s

Company".

A f t e r

t h e

s a l d

SALVATORE

;OZZCTO

had had

a rncetlng vith t11z s a l d YI;-.tCOS

ARCADIOU I com?oseG 2nd typed a le-cter t o

t h e s a i d

YIANGOS

A R C A C I O U

lnpos lng an

i n t e r e s t c h a r g e o n

t h e a m o u n t o u t s t a n d i n g

if

h e d i d n o t p a y

as

he had promised.

I'

T h i s was

t h e

l e t t e r

ear l ie r

set o u t .

"It was

my

i d e a t h a t t h c

i n t e re s t charged

would o f f s e t Respondents herein would have

t h e

l n t e r e s t

t h a t t h e

t o

ay

on

ove rdue

t axes

and

f l na : ?ce

cha rges ;

because

o f

a l l I

hdd

seen

on

c o n s t r u c t l o n

s l t e s ,

and b e e n ARCADIOU was a Wealthy man

t o l d

by

v a r l o c s p c r s o n s ,

I

s t l l l

h e l d

t h e o p l n i o n

t h a t

t h e s e l d

--

YIAXGOS

who

was

s??k lng

t o augr.?nt

h12

~ W S Y ~ - L I : ~

c e p l t a l by

delayr:1g

payment

t 3 t h e ' C o l l l e Favlng Comymy",

Chouqh !IS was well a b l e

t o p a y p r o n p t l y

had he wished t o cl? so.

17.

TiiAT

o n c e

t h e

ln te rcs t chary? was

Imposed,

-

I

f e l t h a p p i e r

abo7Jt

t n e

s i t m t l o n ,

I n t h a t

I f e l t ComLjany" anG the RcsFordents

I

h a d e n s u r e d

t h a t

t h e

"Collie

Pilv;n;

here;!;

~ ~ o u l ~

n o t

l o s e

money Lhrour;l:

the s a l d "'r'I:,i!,3OS

__-

ARC:\DIO~; 'S

c . = ? r l c l o u >

i a l l u r e

t o p ~ y .

-

-

18 .

TiIAT

It appeared

t,,

m?

t h a t ,

l n g e n e r a l ,

t h e y e a r s

1975

and

1 3 7 6 wcrc

p r o f l t a b l c

b u o y m t

fo r

t h e b u l l d l n y

t r a d e

1"

t h e Vesterr?

suburbs of Melbourr:c,

and I knew of nc reascn

whv

t h e b u i l d i n c l o L ~ e r a t i o n s

of

t h e s a i d

YIANGOS AXCADIOG should prov? t o be

any

e x c e p t i o n

t o

the

r u l c .

1 9 . THAT

my payment of

c o n f i d c n c c

was

r e i n f o r c e d

when

$10 ,000 .00

vas

r e c e i v e d

f r o m t h e

s a i d YIANGOS

I.:ICADIOU

cn 29th

Se2tember

1 0 7 6 .

I c e r t a i r . l y s a l d YIANGOS

kncd

o f y o m e e t l n g s w h i c h t h e

ARCADIOU

-

may

h a v e a t t e n d e d a t

a b o u t

t h a t

tme .

.

. .

/l2

12.

20.

THAT

o n

s e v e r a l

occasions,

bo th

be fo re

and

a f t e r

S e p t e m b e r

1976,

I

h a v e p a r t i c l p a t e d

i n mee t ings wi th

the

Responden t s he re in ,

when

it

was

d e c l i i e d t o

wrlte

o f f b a d d e b t s .

There

was

neve r any d l scuss ion abou t

w r l t l n g

off any

amounts

owed by t h e s a i d

YIAKGOS

ARCADIOU p r i o r t o 1977, because they were

always

considered

to

be good.

22.

THAT on one o r two occasions t h e

" C o l l i e

Paving

Company"

h a s o b t a i n e d ~ u d g e m e n t s

a g a l n s t d e b t o r s

who

had

f a i l e d t o p a y . L e g a l

a c t i o n was

taken on

my

adv lce on

those

occasions:

b u t

I

n e v e r a d v r s e d

l e g a l a c t i o n

a g a i n s t

t h e s a l d

YIAKGOS

ARCADIOU,

no r

was

any eve r t h a t t h e b e s t a n d l e a s t e x p e n s l v e c o u r s e

t a k e n ,

because

l t

s e e n e d

t o

mc

t o a d o p t w l t h

a

s low paycr

who

was

f l n a n c i a l l y

sound

was

t o

l n p o s e a n

l n t e re s t

charge ,

and

walt

u n t l l

he pa ld .

23.

THAT because I never h a d

a n y

s u s p l c i o n

t h a t

t h e s a i d

Y I A N G O S

ARCI?DIOU

was

anythlng more

t h a n a problems, I nevcr

s l o w p a l e r w l t h o c c a s l o n a l

1 l q u l . d l t y

; \arnsd

any

of

t h e Res:;cndents

h e r e i n

t h a t t!le

sa ld Vlangos

F?rcadlou m l g ? , t

have

a

funda rncn ta l

f l nanc la l

problem

which

would prevent

n i m trom payxng all

h15 rlehts

w>.thout

any

great

c l c l a y :

a*ld I

kn?w

c i !10

per son

t o who% t h e s a l 6

'II$NGOS

A,SC.-.LIfJL

-

-

- __ -

-

owed money t o

t h e ? x t e r . t

ti:at

SUCA

persor:

would,

I n my

opin lon ,

have

been

well

advl.;e;l

t o c o n t e m p l a t e

t a k l n g l c g a l a c t l o n a q a l n s t

k i n . "

F o r

t h e p u r p o s s s

of

t h e h c a r l n g ,

a

schedu le

was

produced,

Ighich Mr

Drown

v e r l i l e d , l n t h e following forrr.:

"SCHZDCLE OF AGE or 3 x . w ~ ~ ~

OWIXG BY

YIANGOS

A R C A D I O U TO

COLLIC

PAVI:JG

COh'Ei.LIY

AT EKD OF QUAXTEII, 31.i2.73 TO 3l.12.75

31.12.73 S

239.00

$ 239.00

31.3.74

842.00

842.00

30.6.74

3174.10

3174.10

30.9.74

4246.20

4246.20

31.12.74

8805.50

8805.53

31.3.75

7423. a o

6595.80

828.00

30.6.75

13194.35

6609.31

6585.05

30.9.75

15164.03

10338.70

4825.30

31.12.75 22539.85

10343.20

4235.30

4797.35

3164.00"

. .

./l3

I

Details
AGLC
Re Bird, Alex Neville (as Trustee of the Estate of Yiangos Arcadiou, a bankrupt) Ex parte Pozzuto, Salvatore and Ors [1980] FCA 12
Case
[1980] FCA 12
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court, Alex Neville Bird, as Trustee of the Estate of Yiangos Arcadiou, a bankrupt, sought a declaration that a payment of $10,000 made by the bankrupt to the respondents on 29 September 1976 was void against him. The respondents opposed the application, asserting they were payees in good faith and for valuable consideration, and that the payment was not made under circumstances leading to the inference that they knew or had reason to suspect that the bankrupt was unable to pay his debts as they became due from his own money. The court had to determine whether the respondents were payees in good faith and for valuable consideration in the ordinary course of business, and whether the payment gave them a preference, priority or advantage over other creditors of the bankrupt.

The court found that the respondents had been aware of the bankrupt's financial difficulties and had knowledge that would lead a reasonable person to suspect that the bankrupt was unable to pay his debts as they became due. The respondents had been involved in frequent dealings with the bankrupt, and had observed the accumulation of valuable goods on the bankrupt's premises, which should have raised concerns about the bankrupt's financial situation. The court held that the payment of $10,000 was made under circumstances that led to the inference that the respondents knew or had reason to suspect that the bankrupt was unable to pay his debts, and therefore, they were not payees in good faith and for valuable consideration in the ordinary course of business.

The court declared that the payment of $10,000 made by the bankrupt to the respondents on 29 September 1976 was void against the applicant as Trustee of the property of the bankrupt. The court further ordered the respondents to pay to the applicant the sum of $10,000, together with taxed costs of and incidental to the application, including reserved costs, such costs to be taxed, if not agreed. Liberty to apply was reserved to either party.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.