Re: Baby D

In the matter of *Re: Baby D*, heard by Young J, the proceedings concerned a dispute involving the parents of Baby D, the Hospital, and the Office of the Public Advocate. The specific nature of the dispute is not detailed in the provided text, but it involved significant legal representation for all parties, including Senior Counsel for the Hospital and amicus curiae for the Office of the Public Advocate.

The court was required to determine the appropriate course of action regarding the transcription and dissemination of the ex tempore reasons for judgment. Furthermore, the court needed to address the costs associated with the listing and hearing of the proceedings, reserving these for future determination. The court also certified that the matter reasonably required the attendance of counsel for the parents, Senior Counsel for the Hospital, counsel for the Independent Children’s Lawyer, and Senior Counsel appearing amicus curiae for the Office of the Public Advocate, pursuant to Rule 19.50 of the Family Law Rules.

Young J ordered that the ex tempore reasons for judgment be immediately transcribed and placed on the Court file, with copies to be provided to all parties and the Office of the Public Advocate. The costs of the proceedings were reserved for mention within seven days. The court's reasoning for these orders is not elaborated upon in the provided text, beyond the certification of the necessity of counsel's attendance.