Re an application for Bail by Vasko Stankovski
Case
•
[2016] VSC 310
•2 June 2016 (Revised 3 June 2016)
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Re an application for Bail by Vasko Stankovski [2016] VSC 310
[2016] VSC 310
2 June 2016 (Revised 3 June 2016)
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant, Vasko Stankovski, applied for bail in the County Court of Victoria in relation to a range of charges brought against him while he was already on bail for other offences. The applicant, who has a history of drug-related offences and addiction, had been offered a place in a residential rehabilitation program. The court was required to determine whether bail should be granted, considering the applicant's previous convictions, his drug addiction, and the offer of rehabilitation. The court was also required to assess the risk of the applicant reoffending while on bail.
The court noted that the applicant had been on bail for other charges at the time of the current application. Despite the offer of a place in a rehabilitation program, the court found that the risk of the applicant reoffending while on bail was too high. The court found that the applicant's previous convictions and history of drug addiction indicated a pattern of behaviour that made it likely that he would reoffend. The court also noted that the applicant had not taken steps to address his drug addiction, which was a significant factor in his criminal behaviour.
Given the factors outlined above, the court refused the applicant's application for bail. The court found that the risk of the applicant reoffending while on bail was too high and that it was not in the interests of justice to grant bail. The court relied on sections 4(2) and 4(4) of the Bail Act 1977 (Vic) in reaching its decision.
No orders were made as the application for bail was refused. The court found that the risk of the applicant reoffending while on bail was too high and that it was not in the interests of justice to grant bail. The court relied on sections 4(2) and 4(4) of the Bail Act 1977 (Vic) in reaching its decision.
The court noted that the applicant had been on bail for other charges at the time of the current application. Despite the offer of a place in a rehabilitation program, the court found that the risk of the applicant reoffending while on bail was too high. The court found that the applicant's previous convictions and history of drug addiction indicated a pattern of behaviour that made it likely that he would reoffend. The court also noted that the applicant had not taken steps to address his drug addiction, which was a significant factor in his criminal behaviour.
Given the factors outlined above, the court refused the applicant's application for bail. The court found that the risk of the applicant reoffending while on bail was too high and that it was not in the interests of justice to grant bail. The court relied on sections 4(2) and 4(4) of the Bail Act 1977 (Vic) in reaching its decision.
No orders were made as the application for bail was refused. The court found that the risk of the applicant reoffending while on bail was too high and that it was not in the interests of justice to grant bail. The court relied on sections 4(2) and 4(4) of the Bail Act 1977 (Vic) in reaching its decision.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Bail
-
Criminal Liability
-
Breach of Contract
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Re Taylor [2020] VSC 146
Cases Citing This Decision
8
Application for bail by JL
[2020] VSC 785
Re Mm
[2020] VSC 691
Re Taylor
[2020] VSC 146
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
0
Robinson v The Queen
[2015] VSCA 161
Mae Loc Tran, bail application
[2008] VSC 191
Bail application by Fadi Haddara
[2014] VSC 284