Re Allbuild Construction Co Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed); ex parte Featherby
Case
•
[2000] WASC 227
•13 SEPTEMBER 2000
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Re Allbuild Construction Co Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed); ex parte Featherby [2000] WASC 227
[2000] WASC 227
13 SEPTEMBER 2000
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The parties involved in the matter were Allbuild Construction Co Pty Ltd and Featherby. The dispute centred around the application for an extension of the convening period in the context of voluntary administration. The case was heard in the Federal Court of Australia.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the application for an extension of the convening period should be granted and what principles should guide the court in making such a decision. The court had to consider the necessity of detailed information to support the application and the appropriate principle to apply in determining the extension.
In delivering the judgment, the court considered the principle that detailed information must be provided to support the application for an extension of the convening period. The court also noted that the application should be assessed based on the merits and the need for the extension. The court found that the application was made in good faith and that there were compelling reasons for the extension, including the complexity of the administration process and the potential benefits to creditors. Consequently, the convening period was extended as requested.
The court's decision was to grant the application for the extension of the convening period. The final order was that the convening period be extended, reflecting the court's consideration of the detailed information provided and the merits of the application.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the application for an extension of the convening period should be granted and what principles should guide the court in making such a decision. The court had to consider the necessity of detailed information to support the application and the appropriate principle to apply in determining the extension.
In delivering the judgment, the court considered the principle that detailed information must be provided to support the application for an extension of the convening period. The court also noted that the application should be assessed based on the merits and the need for the extension. The court found that the application was made in good faith and that there were compelling reasons for the extension, including the complexity of the administration process and the potential benefits to creditors. Consequently, the convening period was extended as requested.
The court's decision was to grant the application for the extension of the convening period. The final order was that the convening period be extended, reflecting the court's consideration of the detailed information provided and the merits of the application.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Insolvency Law
Legal Concepts
-
Insolvency Law
-
Voluntary Administration
-
Convening Period
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Re Allbuild Construction Co Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed); ex parte Featherby [2000] WASC 227
Most Recent Citation
In the matter of Specialty Mens Apparel Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) [2019] VSC 40
Cases Citing This Decision
40
Mighty River International Ltd v Hughes
[2018] HCA 38
Re Riviera Group Pty Ltd
[2009] NSWSC 585
Re Diamond Press Australia Pty Ltd
[2001] NSWSC 313
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
1
Watson v Uniframes Ltd
[1994] FCA 1085
Re Witta Coola Pastoral Co Pty Ltd
[1999] NSWSC 148
Watson v Uniframes Ltd
[1994] FCA 1085