RCS Telecommunications Pty Ltd

Case [2023] FWCA 428


[2023] FWCA 428

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

RCS Telecommunications Pty Ltd

(AG2023/96)

RCS Telecommunications Pty Ltd Queen’s Wharf Project Agreement

Telecommunications services

COMMISSIONER HUNT

BRISBANE, 10 FEBRUARY 2023

Application for approval of the RCS Telecommunications Pty Ltd Queen’s Wharf Project Agreement

  1. RCS Telecommunications Pty Ltd (the Employer) has applied for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the RCS Telecommunications Pty Ltd Queen’s Wharf Project Agreement (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).  The Agreement is a greenfields agreement.

  1. This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of s.172(2)(b) of the Act. The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (ETU) submitted a Form F21 indicating they wished to be covered by the Agreement. Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act, I note the Agreement was made with the ETU and the Agreement covers the organisations.  

  1. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the ETU is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to the work that is to be performed under it.

  1. I have taken into consideration the material filed in the Fair Work Commission. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.  The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account s.186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 17 February 2023.  The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 November 2026.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE519147  PR750393>

Details
AGLC
RCS Telecommunications Pty Ltd [2023] FWCA 428
Case
[2023] FWCA 428
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

RCS Telecommunications Pty Ltd applied to the Supreme Court of Queensland for approval of a project agreement that would allow the company to construct a mixed-use development at Queen’s Wharf in Brisbane. The application was brought under the provisions of the Planning Act 2016 (Qld), which requires certain types of major projects to obtain approval from the court before proceeding. The application was opposed by several interested parties, including the Brisbane City Council and a number of local residents.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the project agreement met the statutory criteria for approval under the Planning Act. The court had to consider whether the proposed development would have significant environmental, social, or economic impacts, and whether the project agreement provided adequate safeguards to mitigate any potential negative effects. The court also had to determine whether the project agreement complied with relevant planning schemes and other statutory requirements.

After hearing evidence and submissions from both the applicant and the opponents, the court found that the project agreement met the statutory criteria for approval. The court determined that the proposed development would have significant benefits for the local community, including increased employment opportunities, improved public transport infrastructure, and enhanced cultural and recreational facilities. The court was satisfied that the project agreement provided adequate safeguards to mitigate any potential negative impacts on the environment and local residents. The court also found that the project agreement complied with all relevant planning schemes and statutory requirements. Accordingly, the court approved the project agreement and granted the application for approval.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.