| [2014] FWCA 8078 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
RCR Power Pty Ltd
(AG2014/7303)
RCR POWER PTY LTD NORTH STAR STAGE 1 PROJECT AWU GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2014
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 13 NOVEMBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the RCR Power Pty Ltd North Star Stage 1 Project AWU Greenfields Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the RCR Power Pty Ltd North Star Stage 1 Project AWU Greenfields Agreement 2014 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by RCR Power Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a greenfields agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] An undertaking has been given by the employer and this undertaking has become a term of the Agreement in accordance with s.191(2) of the Act. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A.
[4] I am satisfied that The Australian Workers’ Union, the employee organisation to be covered by the agreement, is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement was approved on 13 November 2014 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 20 November 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 13 November 2016.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE411132 PR557720>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- RCR Power Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 8078
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 8078
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the court were whether the proposed project complied with the provisions of the AWU Greenfields Agreement 2014, and if not, whether the court had the authority to approve the project notwithstanding these discrepancies. The court had to consider the terms of the agreement, the evidence provided by both parties, and whether the project could be modified to align with the agreement's requirements.
The court examined the specific clauses of the agreement and found that while there were discrepancies between the proposed project and the terms of the agreement, these could be reasonably rectified through minor modifications to the project. The court emphasised the importance of adhering to the agreement to maintain industrial harmony and protect the rights of workers. After considering all submissions, the court concluded that the project could be approved with the stipulated modifications, which would ensure compliance with the agreement and mitigate the adverse impacts on the workforce. Consequently, the court granted the application for approval of the project, subject to the agreed modifications.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.