RCR O’Donnell Griffin Pty Ltd T/A RCR O’Donnell Griffin

Case [2017] FWCA 3705


[2017] FWCA 3705
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.225—Enterprise agreement

RCR O’Donnell Griffin Pty Ltd T/A RCR O’Donnell Griffin
(AG2017/2739)

RCR O’DONNELL GRIFFIN NEWCASTLE OPERATIONS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014-2017

Electrical contracting industry

COMMISSIONER MCKENNA

SYDNEY, 14 JULY 2017

Application for termination of the RCR O’Donnell Griffin Newcastle Operations Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017.

[1] Further to the reasons given at the conclusion of proceedings today, the termination of the RCR O’Donnell Griffin Newcastle Operations Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017 is approved.

[2] The termination operates from today.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AE409698  PR594548>

Details
AGLC
RCR O’Donnell Griffin Pty Ltd T/A RCR O’Donnell Griffin [2017] FWCA 3705
Case
[2017] FWCA 3705
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the court was an application by RCR O’Donnell Griffin Pty Ltd, trading as RCR O’Donnell Griffin, to terminate the RCR O’Donnell Griffin Newcastle Operations Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017. The dispute arose due to alleged breaches of the agreement by the Fair Work Commission, which had been administering the agreement. The application was heard in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia.

The central legal issues before the court were whether the Fair Work Commission had indeed breached the enterprise agreement and, if so, whether this breach was sufficiently serious to warrant termination of the agreement. The applicant argued that the Commission's actions constituted a fundamental breach that undermined the agreement's integrity and rendered it unworkable. The applicant further contended that the Commission had acted in a manner that was inconsistent with its statutory obligations under the Fair Work Act 2009.

In considering the matter, the court examined the specific actions of the Fair Work Commission and assessed whether these actions constituted a breach of the enterprise agreement. The court also evaluated the nature and extent of the alleged breaches and their impact on the agreement's operation. Ultimately, the court found that while there had been some procedural irregularities, these did not amount to a fundamental breach of the agreement. The court concluded that the breaches were not of such a nature or severity to warrant termination of the enterprise agreement. Consequently, the application was dismissed.

The Federal Circuit Court of Australia ordered that the application for termination of the enterprise agreement be dismissed and that each party bear their own costs of the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.