| [2014] FWCA 8274 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
RCR O’Donnell Griffin Pty Ltd
(AG2014/8161)
RCR INFRASTRUCTURE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTING NORTH WEST OPERATIONS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014 - 2017
Electrical contracting industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON | MELBOURNE, 20 NOVEMBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the RCR Infrastructure Electrical Contracting North West Operations Enterprise Agreement 2014 - 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the RCR Infrastructure Electrical Contracting North West Operations Enterprise Agreement 2014 - 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by RCR O’Donnell Griffin Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 27 November 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE411251 PR557990>
- AGLC
- RCR O’Donnell Griffin Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 8274
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 8274
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement, whether it complied with the Fair Work Act 2009, and whether it met the statutory requirements for approval. The union argued that the agreement was not genuinely an enterprise agreement as it had been heavily influenced by the employer and did not reflect the true wishes of the majority of the employees. The employer contended that the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement and that it complied with all legal requirements.
The court found that the agreement was genuinely an enterprise agreement and met the statutory requirements for approval. The court held that the union had failed to prove that the agreement was not genuinely an enterprise agreement or that it did not comply with the Fair Work Act. The court rejected the union's argument that the employer had unduly influenced the agreement and found that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith. The court further found that the agreement contained all the required terms and that it was consistent with the Fair Work Act.
The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the decision of the FWC to approve the agreement. The court ordered that the agreement be approved as a certified agreement under the Fair Work Act. The court noted that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment and that it was in the best interests of the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.