| [2018] FWCA 5866 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
RCR Energy Pty Ltd
(AG2018/3082)
RCR ENERGY PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | MELBOURNE, 18 SEPTEMBER 2018 |
Application for approval of the RCR Energy Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the RCR Energy Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by RCR Energy Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union and “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 25 September 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 17 September 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE500177 PR700510>
- AGLC
- RCR Energy Pty Ltd [2018] FWCA 5866
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 5866
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the agreement's provisions on redundancy were in compliance with the requirements of section 234 of the Fair Work Act, which mandates that an enterprise agreement must not make provision for matters that are prohibited by the Act. The Fair Work Act prohibits agreements that allow for the dismissal of an employee on the ground of redundancy unless the agreement provides for the process for determining which employees are to be made redundant. The court had to determine if the agreement met this requirement.
In reaching its decision, the Fair Work Commission examined the specific provisions of the agreement in question. The agreement provided for redundancies but did not outline a process for determining which employees would be made redundant. The Commission found that this omission rendered the agreement non-compliant with section 234 of the Fair Work Act. Consequently, the application for approval of the agreement was dismissed. The Commission emphasised the importance of clear and specific processes in redundancy provisions to ensure fairness and compliance with legislative requirements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.