| [2017] FWCA 1389 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
RCQ Construction Pty Ltd
(AG2017/616)
RCQ CONSTRUCTION PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 9 MARCH 2017 |
Application for approval of the RCQ Construction Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the RCQ Construction Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by RCQ Construction Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 16 March 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 15 March 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE423612 PR590881>
- AGLC
- RCQ Construction Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 1389
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 1389
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement was procedurally sound and whether it contained any terms that were invalid under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission had to determine if the agreement was genuinely negotiated and if any of its provisions contravened minimum entitlements or public policy. The applicants argued that the agreement was a fair and reasonable outcome of genuine negotiations, while the objectors raised concerns about the adequacy of representation and the fairness of certain provisions.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission examined the evidence and submissions to assess the procedural fairness of the negotiation process and the substantive fairness of the agreement's terms. The Commission found that the process was generally fair and that the agreement did not contain any terms that were contrary to public policy or minimum entitlements. The Commission noted that while there were some concerns about the representation of junior employees, the overall fairness of the agreement was not compromised to a significant extent. Consequently, the Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement 2017, subject to certain conditions designed to protect the interests of employees.
The Fair Work Commission ordered the approval of the Enterprise Agreement 2017, with conditions aimed at ensuring the continued protection of employee interests. The Commission emphasised that ongoing monitoring and review mechanisms would be in place to address any future concerns about the agreement's implementation. This decision underscored the importance of fair and genuine negotiations in the enterprise bargaining process.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.