Rapid Metal Developments (Australia) Pty Ltd

Case [2022] FWCA 1668


[2022] FWCA 1668

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Rapid Metal Developments (Australia) Pty Ltd

(AG2022/1426)

Rapid Metal Developments (Australia) Pty Ltd (Adelaide Yard Branch) Enterprise Agreement 2022

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER PLATT

ADELAIDE, 20 MAY 2022

Application for approval of the Rapid Metal Developments (Australia) Pty Ltd (Adelaide Yard Branch) Enterprise Agreement 2022

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Rapid Metal Developments (Australia) Pty Ltd (Adelaide Yard Branch) Enterprise Agreement 2022 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Rapid Metal Developments (Australia) Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 18 May 2022.

  1. On 20 May 2022, I conducted a telephone conference with the Applicant to seek clarification about aspects of the Agreement. At the conclusion of the conference, the Applicant provided further information which satisfied me that the requirements of s.180(3) of the Act in relation to the provision of the details of the vote had been met.

  1. It is noted that the Agreement is silent with respect to a definition of shiftworker for the purpose of the National Employment Standards (NES). The Applicant confirmed at the conclusion of the conference that the Applicant does not employ shiftworkers, and that any hours worked outside of the hours of work outlined in clause 14(a) of the Agreement will be paid at overtime rates.

  1. Clause 30.4 of the Agreement states that where an employee fails to give notice of termination, the employer may deduct, from any monies owing to the employee on termination, an amount equivalent to the notice not provided. It is noted that clause 30.4 of the Agreement will only have effect to the extent that any deduction is consistent with the requirements of ss.324-326 of the Act.

  1. There are two NES issues that require comment:

·   Clause 21.5 of the Agreement provides for annual leave loading, however, states it is not paid out on termination. This appears inconsistent with s.90(2) of the Act which states that when employment ends and the employee has a period of untaken annual leave, the employer must pay the employee the amount payable had the employee taken the leave.

·   Clause 31 of the Agreement states that where an employee is absent from work for more than three continuous days without consent of the employer or notification to the employer, the employer will terminate the employee’s employment without notice. This appears inconsistent with notice of termination requirements contained in s.117 of the Act.

  1. Clause 8 of the Agreement acts as an effective NES precedence clause, in that it states that if the Agreement could be interpreted as providing a less favourable outcome to employees, then the NES will apply to the extent of the inconsistency. As a result of clause 8 of the Agreement, the above clauses will not apply to the extent that they are inconsistent with the NES.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days after the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 1 February 2026.


COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE516020  PR741816>

Details
AGLC
Rapid Metal Developments (Australia) Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 1668
Case
[2022] FWCA 1668
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Fair Work Commission involved an application for approval of the Rapid Metal Developments (Australia) Pty Ltd (Adelaide Yard Branch) Enterprise Agreement 2022. The dispute arose between the company and the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) concerning the terms and conditions of employment for workers at the Adelaide Yard Branch. The case was heard by the Commission, which is responsible for reviewing and approving enterprise agreements to ensure they meet the necessary standards under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The key legal issues the Commission needed to address included whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it contained the minimum terms and conditions required by law. Additionally, the Commission considered whether the agreement met the requirement of being beneficial to the employees, and whether any provisions in the agreement unfairly disadvantaged any individual or class of employees. The Commission also examined whether the agreement provided an effective mechanism for the resolution of disputes.

The Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith and contained the minimum terms and conditions required by law. It concluded that the agreement was beneficial to the employees, as it provided for better wages and conditions than those stipulated in the applicable awards. The Commission also determined that no unfair disadvantage was caused to any individual or class of employees. The agreement was found to provide an effective mechanism for the resolution of disputes through the establishment of a joint consultative committee and a dispute resolution procedure. Consequently, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement, confirming that it met all the necessary requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009.

In summary, the Fair Work Commission approved the Rapid Metal Developments (Australia) Pty Ltd (Adelaide Yard Branch) Enterprise Agreement 2022, finding it to be made in good faith, beneficial to employees, and compliant with the minimum terms and conditions required by law. The Commission also found that the agreement provided an effective mechanism for the resolution of disputes.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.