| [2021] FWCA 3084 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Randall Industries (Aust) Pty Ltd
(AG2021/5289)
AMWU AND RANDALL INDUSTRIES (AUST) P/L COLLECTIVE BARGAINING WORKSHOP AGREEMENT 2020
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT COLMAN | MELBOURNE, 28 MAY 2021 |
Application for approval of the AMWU and Randall Industries (Aust) P/L Collective Bargaining Workshop Agreement 2020.
[1] Randall Industries (Aust) Pty Ltd has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the AMWU and Randall Industries (Aust) P/L Collective Bargaining Workshop Agreement 2020 (the Agreement) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval has been met.
[3] The application was not lodged within 14 days after the Agreement was made. Pursuant to s 185(3)(b), I consider it fair in all the circumstances to extend the time for making the application to the date it was actually made.
[4] The Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement was approved on 28 May 2021 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 4 June 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2023.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE511652 PR730265>
- AGLC
- Randall Industries (Aust) Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 3084
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 3084
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed agreement complied with the requirements set out in section 234 of the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission needed to assess if the agreement was a genuine outcome of genuine collective bargaining between the parties. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and the company. Furthermore, the Commission examined if the agreement provided for a fair and efficient process for resolving future disputes and for the protection of employees’ rights.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was a genuine outcome of collective bargaining and met the statutory criteria. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for a structured process for future negotiations, which was in the best interests of both parties. The agreement included provisions for dispute resolution mechanisms that were fair and efficient. The Commission concluded that the agreement would protect employees’ rights and facilitate effective industrial relations between the company and the union. As a result, the Commission approved the proposed Collective Bargaining Workshop Agreement. The final orders of the Commission were that the agreement be approved and registered with the Fair Work Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.