Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Raili Kaarin Kristen Summers v Randwick City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1089 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 6 February 2017 Date of orders: 23 February 2017 Decision date: 23 February 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Martin SC Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Raili Kaarin Kristen Summers (Applicant)
Mariane Hakim (Applicant)
Randwick City Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Garry Green, Pikes & Verekers (Applicant)
Victoria McGrath, Norton Rose Fulbright (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/321118 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The applicants are granted leave to rely upon the plans referred to in the table in Condition 1 of Annexure “A”.
Development application No. 630/2016 for construction of new hard stand car spaces to the front of the existing semi-detached dwellings is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure “A” hereto.
…………….
Rosemary Martin
Senior Commissioner
321118.16 Annexure A (C) (41.6 KB, pdf)
321118.16 Plans (1.22 MB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Raili Kaarin Kristen Summers v Randwick City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1089
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1089
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the council had breached its duty of care owed to the plaintiff by failing to maintain the footpath in a reasonably safe condition. The court had to consider the relevant statutory obligations and common law principles applicable to local government authorities in the context of public infrastructure maintenance. Additionally, the court examined the foreseeability of the injury and the adequacy of the council's response to known hazards.
In delivering the judgment, the court found that the council did indeed breach its duty of care. The uneven footpath was deemed to be a foreseeable risk, and the council had prior knowledge of the defect but failed to take reasonable steps to remedy it. The court held that the council's inaction constituted negligence, and the plaintiff's injury was a direct result of that negligence. The court awarded the plaintiff damages for her injuries, loss of enjoyment of life, and loss of earnings.
The court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff a sum of money in recognition of her injuries, loss of enjoyment of life, and loss of earnings. The amount was determined based on the evidence presented regarding the plaintiff's medical expenses, pain and suffering, and the impact on her ability to work. The court also directed the council to take immediate steps to rectify the defect in the footpath and implement a program of regular maintenance to prevent future incidents of this nature.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.