RAIL INDUSTRY AWARD 2010
Case
•
[2017] FWCFB 719
•17 FEBRUARY 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Rail Industry Award 2010 [2017] FWCFB 719
[2017] FWCFB 719
17 FEBRUARY 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The matter before the Fair Work Commission (FWC) involved a four-yearly review of the Rail Industry Award 2010, specifically addressing the rates of pay for work on a Saturday and the definition of the Level 9 Clerical, Administrative, and Professional classification. The review was brought by the Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union, representing employees in the rail industry, and the Rail, Tram and Bus Industry, representing employers. The union argued for higher pay rates for Saturday work and a revised definition of the Level 9 classification to include roles such as Rail Control Centre Operators.
The legal issues the court was required to address included whether the existing pay rates for work on Saturdays were fair and reasonable, and if the definition of Level 9 adequately captured the duties and responsibilities of roles such as Rail Control Centre Operators. The union contended that the current classification did not sufficiently account for the complexities and demands of such positions, which warranted higher compensation.
In its decision, the FWC considered the submissions from both parties and the broader economic context. The commission found that the current pay rates for Saturday work were fair and reasonable, considering the relevant factors. However, regarding the definition of Level 9, the FWC determined that the existing classification did not adequately encompass the roles and responsibilities of Rail Control Centre Operators. Consequently, the FWC amended the definition of Level 9 to include these roles, thereby ensuring that employees in such positions would be appropriately compensated for their work.
The legal issues the court was required to address included whether the existing pay rates for work on Saturdays were fair and reasonable, and if the definition of Level 9 adequately captured the duties and responsibilities of roles such as Rail Control Centre Operators. The union contended that the current classification did not sufficiently account for the complexities and demands of such positions, which warranted higher compensation.
In its decision, the FWC considered the submissions from both parties and the broader economic context. The commission found that the current pay rates for Saturday work were fair and reasonable, considering the relevant factors. However, regarding the definition of Level 9, the FWC determined that the existing classification did not adequately encompass the roles and responsibilities of Rail Control Centre Operators. Consequently, the FWC amended the definition of Level 9 to include these roles, thereby ensuring that employees in such positions would be appropriately compensated for their work.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Contract Formation
-
Jurisdiction
-
Unconscionable Conduct
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
4 yearly review of modern awards [2020] FWCFB 421
Cases Citing This Decision
8
4 yearly review of modern awards
[2020] FWCFB 421
4 yearly review of modern awards
[2019] FWCFB 6861
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
0
4 Yearly Review of Modern Awards: Preliminary Jurisdictional Issues
[2014] FWCFB 1788
4 Yearly Review of Modern Awards: Preliminary Jurisdictional Issues
[2014] FWCFB 1788