Rahman v Riordan

Case

[2010] NSWCA 288

1 November 2010


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Rahman v Riordan [2010] NSWCA 288 [2010] NSWCA 288 1 November 2010

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Rahman v Riordan concerned an appeal to the Full Federal Court of Australia. The appellant, Mr. Rahman, sought to appeal a decision of a single judge of the Federal Court. The nature of the dispute and the specific orders made by the primary judge are not detailed in the provided text, but the appeal itself was the subject of the Full Court's consideration.

The central legal issue before the Full Court was whether the primary judge had erred in their original decision, thereby warranting appellate intervention. The specific grounds of appeal, and therefore the precise legal questions the Full Court was required to determine, are not elaborated upon in the provided excerpt.

The Full Court, comprising Allsop P, ultimately dismissed the appellant's notice of motion. This indicates that the Court found no merit in the grounds of appeal presented by Mr. Rahman. The Court ordered that the appellant pay the costs of the respondent.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Costs

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
Rahman v Riordan [2010] NSWCA 375

Cases Citing This Decision

3

Lambourne v Baker (No 6) [2025] NSWCA 45
Rahman v Dubs [2012] NSWCA 98
Rahman v Riordan [2010] NSWCA 375
Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

2