| [2019] FWCA 959 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Radploy Pty Ltd T/A Lake Imaging
(AG2018/4743)
LAKE IMAGING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT (IMAGING STAFF - GEELONG) 2018
Health and welfare services | |
COMMISSIONER BISSETT | MELBOURNE, 14 FEBRUARY 2019 |
Application for approval of the Lake Imaging Enterprise Agreement (Imaging Staff - Geelong) 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Lake Imaging Enterprise Agreement (Imaging Staff - Geelong) 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Radploy Pty Ltd T/A Lake Imaging. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Pursuant to subsection 190(3) of the Act, I accept the Undertakings.
[4] Subject to the Undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The Health Services Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 21 February 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 20 February 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE501806 PR704938>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Radploy Pty Ltd T/A Lake Imaging [2019] FWCA 959
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 959
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were primarily whether the proposed agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in terms of ensuring that it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and whether it complied with the process for enterprise agreements set out in the Act. The court had to consider whether the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of both the employer and the employees and whether the process leading to the agreement was fair and in accordance with the law.
The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement was fair and reasonable in all its terms. The Commission noted that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and that it provided for a fair balance of outcomes for both parties. The Commission also found that the process leading to the agreement was fair and that the employees had been adequately informed and consulted. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, determining that it met the requirements of the Fair Work Act.
No further orders were made by the Commission. The approved agreement now serves as a binding contract between Lake Imaging and the employees represented by the Health Services Union of Australia.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.