R v Winters
Case
•
[2022] ACTSC 371
•26 April 2022
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Winters [2022] ACTSC 371
[2022] ACTSC 371
26 April 2022
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Joshua Luke Winters was convicted on a number of criminal charges and sentenced in the Magistrates Court of the Australian Capital Territory. The charges included aggravated burglary, minor theft, damaging property, dishonestly driving a motor vehicle without consent, theft, driving while disqualified as a repeat offender, and trespass. The court considered the subjective circumstances surrounding the offences, including Winters' disadvantaged childhood, and imposed sentences of imprisonment and fines, along with a Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order.
The court had to determine the appropriate sentences for each offence, taking into account the subjective circumstances of Winters' disadvantaged childhood. The court also needed to decide whether a Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order was appropriate and, if so, what the terms of the order should be.
The court held that the subjective circumstances of Winters' disadvantaged childhood warranted consideration but did not mitigate the seriousness of the offences. The court found that a Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order was appropriate and imposed a custodial sentence for the primary offence of aggravated burglary, as well as associated offences. The court also imposed fines and suspended the custodial part of the Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order until the end of the total sentence. The treatment and supervision part of the Order included core conditions and specific directions for Winters to attend a residential drug rehabilitation program and comply with any further treatment or counselling required.
Joshua Luke Winters was convicted of the following offences and sentenced accordingly: (1) aggravated burglary and sentenced to 18 months imprisonment; (2) minor theft by joint commission and sentenced to 2 months imprisonment; (3) damaging property and sentenced to 6 months imprisonment; (4) aggravated burglary by joint commission and sentenced to 18 months imprisonment; (5) minor theft and sentenced to 7 months imprisonment; (6) dishonestly driving a motor vehicle without consent and sentenced to 10 months imprisonment; (7) theft by joint commission and sentenced to 9 months imprisonment; (8) driving while disqualified as a repeat offender and sentenced to 6 months imprisonment; (9) minor theft and sentenced to 2 months imprisonment; and (10) trespass and fined $500. A Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order was also made for a period of 2 years, with specific directions for Winters to attend a residential drug rehabilitation program and comply with any further treatment or counselling required.
The court had to determine the appropriate sentences for each offence, taking into account the subjective circumstances of Winters' disadvantaged childhood. The court also needed to decide whether a Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order was appropriate and, if so, what the terms of the order should be.
The court held that the subjective circumstances of Winters' disadvantaged childhood warranted consideration but did not mitigate the seriousness of the offences. The court found that a Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order was appropriate and imposed a custodial sentence for the primary offence of aggravated burglary, as well as associated offences. The court also imposed fines and suspended the custodial part of the Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order until the end of the total sentence. The treatment and supervision part of the Order included core conditions and specific directions for Winters to attend a residential drug rehabilitation program and comply with any further treatment or counselling required.
Joshua Luke Winters was convicted of the following offences and sentenced accordingly: (1) aggravated burglary and sentenced to 18 months imprisonment; (2) minor theft by joint commission and sentenced to 2 months imprisonment; (3) damaging property and sentenced to 6 months imprisonment; (4) aggravated burglary by joint commission and sentenced to 18 months imprisonment; (5) minor theft and sentenced to 7 months imprisonment; (6) dishonestly driving a motor vehicle without consent and sentenced to 10 months imprisonment; (7) theft by joint commission and sentenced to 9 months imprisonment; (8) driving while disqualified as a repeat offender and sentenced to 6 months imprisonment; (9) minor theft and sentenced to 2 months imprisonment; and (10) trespass and fined $500. A Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order was also made for a period of 2 years, with specific directions for Winters to attend a residential drug rehabilitation program and comply with any further treatment or counselling required.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Aggravated Burglary
-
Minor Theft
-
Damage to Property
-
Dishonest Driving
-
Trespass
-
Sentencing
-
Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order
-
Jurisdiction
-
Joint Commission
-
Subjective Circumstances
-
Childhood Disadvantage
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Winters [2022] ACTSC 371
Most Recent Citation
Director of Public Prosecutions v Swain (a pseudonym) (No 2) [2025] ACTSC 209
Cases Citing This Decision
18
Sullivan v The King
[2025] NTCCA 4
Director of Public Prosecutions v Swain (a pseudonym) (No 2)
[2025] ACTSC 209
Hayne v Zheng
[2023] ACTSC 326
Cases Cited
42
Statutory Material Cited
7
Bugmy v The Queen
[2013] HCA 37
Bugmy v The Queen
[2013] HCA 37
R v McHughes
[2021] ACTSC 92