R v Williams
Case
•
[2004] QCA 27
•16 February 2004
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Williams [2004] QCA 27
[2004] QCA 27
16 February 2004
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of R v Williams was before the court where the applicant, aged 44, had pleaded guilty to multiple offences including burglary, fraud, stealing, and unlawful use of a motor vehicle. The court sentenced the applicant to 18 months imprisonment, to be suspended after four months. The applicant subsequently applied for leave to appeal against the sentence, arguing that it should have been wholly suspended in light of his personal circumstances.
The court was required to consider whether the sentence imposed was appropriate given the applicant's personal circumstances and whether the sentence should be varied. The court had to weigh the seriousness of the offences against the applicant's personal circumstances and any mitigating factors.
In considering the application, the court examined the nature and circumstances of the offences, the applicant's criminal history, and his personal circumstances. The court found that the sentence was appropriate given the seriousness of the offences and the need for general deterrence. The court was not persuaded that the sentence should have been wholly suspended and therefore refused the application for leave to appeal.
The court's final order was that the application for leave to appeal against the sentence was refused.
The court was required to consider whether the sentence imposed was appropriate given the applicant's personal circumstances and whether the sentence should be varied. The court had to weigh the seriousness of the offences against the applicant's personal circumstances and any mitigating factors.
In considering the application, the court examined the nature and circumstances of the offences, the applicant's criminal history, and his personal circumstances. The court found that the sentence was appropriate given the seriousness of the offences and the need for general deterrence. The court was not persuaded that the sentence should have been wholly suspended and therefore refused the application for leave to appeal.
The court's final order was that the application for leave to appeal against the sentence was refused.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Burglary and Like Offences
-
Sentencing
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Williams [2004] QCA 27
Most Recent Citation
MIL v Commissioner of Police [2021] QDC 330
Cases Citing This Decision
8
MIL v Commissioner of Police
[2021] QDC 330
King v Queensland Police Service
[2019] QDC 131
R v Bryant
[2007] QCA 247