R v Turner
Case
•
[2016] SASCFC 61
•18 May 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Turner [2016] SASCFC 61
[2016] SASCFC 61
18 May 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appeal concerned the sentencing of the respondent, R, for drug trafficking offences involving MDMA. The appeal was brought before the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia, constituted by Kourakis CJ, Kelly and Blue JJ.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the sentence imposed on the respondent was manifestly excessive or inadequate, requiring interference on appeal. This involved an examination of the sentencing process and the application of general principles relating to non-custodial orders, specifically suspended sentences of imprisonment.
The Court considered the respondent's objective seriousness of the offending, the subjective factors relevant to sentencing, and the principles of sentencing. The Court ultimately found that the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive and that the grounds of appeal were not established.
The appeal was dismissed.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the sentence imposed on the respondent was manifestly excessive or inadequate, requiring interference on appeal. This involved an examination of the sentencing process and the application of general principles relating to non-custodial orders, specifically suspended sentences of imprisonment.
The Court considered the respondent's objective seriousness of the offending, the subjective factors relevant to sentencing, and the principles of sentencing. The Court ultimately found that the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive and that the grounds of appeal were not established.
The appeal was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
-
Evidence
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Charge
-
Sentencing
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Turner [2016] SASCFC 61
Most Recent Citation
R v Chen & Liu [2023] SADC 10
Cases Citing This Decision
16
Impiombato and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review)
[2017] AATA 237
Coolwell and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review)
[2016] AATA 933
R v KL
[2017] QSC 144
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
1
R v Weatherill
[2015] SASCFC 113
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li
[2013] HCA 18
Barbaro v The Queen
[2014] HCA 2