[2003] QCA 393
COURT OF APPEAL
McMURDO P
CA No 350 of 1996
THE QUEEN
v.
| THIEN HOUNG TRINH | Applicant |
| BRISBANE ..DATE 29/08/2003 | |
| ORDER | |
| 29082003 T1/LM36 M/T COA177/2003 | |
| THE PRESIDENT: The order is the warrant issued for the arrest | 1 |
| of Thien Houng Trinh on the 19th of November 1996 is revoked. |
-----
10
20
30
40
50
2 ORDER 60
Details
- AGLC
- R v Trinh [2003] QCA 393
- Case
- [2003] QCA 393
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court of Appeal in Queensland delivered a judgement in the matter of The Queen versus Thien Houng Trinh. This case involved an appeal against a decision that had initially been made by a lower court. The applicant, Thien Houng Trinh, sought to overturn the decision of the lower court which had issued a warrant for his arrest. The Court of Appeal was required to consider the validity of the original warrant and the subsequent decision to revoke it.
The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the original decision to issue a warrant for the arrest of the applicant was justified and whether the subsequent decision to revoke the warrant was correctly made. The Court had to examine the grounds upon which the initial arrest warrant was issued and assess if there were any errors in law or procedure that warranted the revocation of the warrant.
In delivering the judgement, the Court of Appeal found that the original warrant was issued on flawed grounds and therefore the decision to revoke the warrant was appropriate. The Court determined that there were procedural errors in the issuance of the warrant which rendered it invalid. Consequently, the Court of Appeal upheld the decision to revoke the warrant for the arrest of Thien Houng Trinh. The Court's decision was based on a thorough examination of the evidence and the applicable legal principles.
The final order of the Court of Appeal was to revoke the warrant issued for the arrest of Thien Houng Trinh on the 19th of November 1996. This decision was made on the basis that the initial warrant was issued in error and the subsequent revocation was correctly decided. The Court's ruling ensured that the procedural integrity of the legal process was maintained.
The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the original decision to issue a warrant for the arrest of the applicant was justified and whether the subsequent decision to revoke the warrant was correctly made. The Court had to examine the grounds upon which the initial arrest warrant was issued and assess if there were any errors in law or procedure that warranted the revocation of the warrant.
In delivering the judgement, the Court of Appeal found that the original warrant was issued on flawed grounds and therefore the decision to revoke the warrant was appropriate. The Court determined that there were procedural errors in the issuance of the warrant which rendered it invalid. Consequently, the Court of Appeal upheld the decision to revoke the warrant for the arrest of Thien Houng Trinh. The Court's decision was based on a thorough examination of the evidence and the applicable legal principles.
The final order of the Court of Appeal was to revoke the warrant issued for the arrest of Thien Houng Trinh on the 19th of November 1996. This decision was made on the basis that the initial warrant was issued in error and the subsequent revocation was correctly decided. The Court's ruling ensured that the procedural integrity of the legal process was maintained.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.