R v TIPPINS

Case

[2011] SASCFC 156

12 December 2011


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
R v Tippins [2011] SASCFC 156 [2011] SASCFC 156 12 December 2011

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appeal concerned the sentencing of the appellant, who had pleaded guilty to six offences: possessing a prescribed firearm without a licence, possessing a prohibited weapon, carrying an offensive weapon, driving a motor vehicle without authorisation, driving a motor vehicle with unassigned registration plates, and possessing unsecured ammunition. These offences were committed while the appellant was subject to a previously imposed suspended sentence of eight weeks imprisonment for unrelated offending. The appellant admitted breaching the conditions of that suspended sentence. The sentencing judge imposed a head sentence of 10 months imprisonment for the first three offences, took into account time in custody, and added two months for the breach of bond. The appellant also received a five-year disqualification from holding a driver's licence for the driving offence, and was convicted without penalty for the final two offences, resulting in a total effective sentence of seven months and four days imprisonment.

The legal issues before the appellate court included whether the sentencing judge had correctly calculated the time in custody and the additional period for the breach of bond, and whether the imposition of a licence disqualification was mandatory. The court was also required to determine the appropriateness of suspending the sentence, given the appellant's commission of further offences whilst on a suspended sentence bond.

The respondent conceded on appeal that the sentencing judge had miscalculated the time in custody and erred in adding two months, rather than the correct period of eight weeks, to the sentence for the breach of bond. The appellate court found that suspending the sentence, or partially suspending it, was inappropriate in these circumstances. While the head sentence of 10 months was considered appropriate, it was to be reduced by the correct amount of time in custody. The court also determined that the sentencing judge had erred in considering a licence disqualification to be mandatory, although it found a disqualification to be appropriate in this case.

The appeal was allowed. The suspended sentence of eight weeks imprisonment was revoked and ordered to be carried into effect. The appellant was sentenced to four months and 28 days imprisonment, to commence at the expiration of the revoked suspended sentence. The period of disqualification from holding or obtaining a driver's licence was reduced to four years. The appellant was convicted without penalty for the final two offences.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Breach

  • Charge

  • Remedies

  • Sentencing

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

1