R v Snow
Case
•
[2021] ACTSC 342
•21 June 2021
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Snow [2021] ACTSC 342
[2021] ACTSC 342
21 June 2021
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of R v Snow involved the defendant, Daniel Ian Snow, who was convicted of burglary and damaging property. The court was required to determine his sentence and whether to impose a Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order. The matter was heard in the Magistrates Court of the Australian Capital Territory.
The primary legal issues before the court were the appropriate sentences for the offences of burglary and damaging property and whether a Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order should be imposed under section 12A of the Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005 (ACT). The court had to consider the principles of sentencing, the circumstances of the offences, and the defendant's history and prospects for rehabilitation.
The court determined that Daniel Ian Snow should be sentenced to 17 months imprisonment for the offence of burglary and 3 months imprisonment for the offence of damaging property. The sentences were to run concurrently, with the burglary sentence starting on 19 March 2021 and the damaging property sentence to commence on 19 July 2022. The court imposed a Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order for 15 months and 28 days, to run concurrently with the imprisonment sentence, with the custodial part of the Order suspended until 18 October 2022. The court further ordered that the defendant must attend a residential drug rehabilitation program at Canberra Recovery Services and comply with various conditions and directions regarding his treatment, supervision, and obligations under the Order.
The court made several additional orders, including that Daniel Ian Snow must report to ACT Corrective Services if he leaves the rehabilitation program before completion and comply with directions regarding his residence, associations, and attendance at Court. The court also directed the defendant to appear by electronic means in Court on 2 July 2021 and to sign a sealed copy of the Order and an undertaking to comply with it before leaving the Court precincts.
The primary legal issues before the court were the appropriate sentences for the offences of burglary and damaging property and whether a Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order should be imposed under section 12A of the Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005 (ACT). The court had to consider the principles of sentencing, the circumstances of the offences, and the defendant's history and prospects for rehabilitation.
The court determined that Daniel Ian Snow should be sentenced to 17 months imprisonment for the offence of burglary and 3 months imprisonment for the offence of damaging property. The sentences were to run concurrently, with the burglary sentence starting on 19 March 2021 and the damaging property sentence to commence on 19 July 2022. The court imposed a Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order for 15 months and 28 days, to run concurrently with the imprisonment sentence, with the custodial part of the Order suspended until 18 October 2022. The court further ordered that the defendant must attend a residential drug rehabilitation program at Canberra Recovery Services and comply with various conditions and directions regarding his treatment, supervision, and obligations under the Order.
The court made several additional orders, including that Daniel Ian Snow must report to ACT Corrective Services if he leaves the rehabilitation program before completion and comply with directions regarding his residence, associations, and attendance at Court. The court also directed the defendant to appear by electronic means in Court on 2 July 2021 and to sign a sealed copy of the Order and an undertaking to comply with it before leaving the Court precincts.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Sentencing
-
Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Snow [2021] ACTSC 342
Most Recent Citation
Director of Public Prosecutions v Powell [2025] ACTSC 282
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Director of Public Prosecutions v Powell
[2025] ACTSC 282
R v Blundell
[2022] ACTSC 379
Director of Public Prosecutions v Powell
[2025] ACTSC 282
Cases Cited
23
Statutory Material Cited
6
Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
[2016] FCA 413
Mill v The Queen
[1988] HCA 70
Wong v The Queen
[2001] HCA 64