R v Rogerson; R v McNamara (No 15)

In this case, the respondents were charged with the murder of the deceased. The respondents appealed against their conviction. The court had to determine whether evidence of the respondents at a shooting range before and after the deceased's murder was relevant and admissible in the case. The respondents argued that the evidence was irrelevant because it did not show that they had been at the shooting range on the day of the murder. The court had to decide whether the evidence was relevant to prove the respondents' identity as the perpetrators of the murder.

The court held that the evidence of the respondents at the shooting range was relevant to the case. The court found that the evidence showed that the respondents had access to firearms and had the opportunity to commit the murder. The court also found that the evidence was relevant to rebut the respondents' alibi and to establish their identity as the perpetrators of the murder. The court held that the evidence was properly admitted and that the respondents' conviction was safe. The appeal was dismissed.

The court held that the evidence of the respondents at the shooting range was relevant to the case and that the respondents' conviction was safe. The court found that the evidence showed that the respondents had access to firearms and had the opportunity to commit the murder. The court also found that the evidence was relevant to rebut the respondents' alibi and to establish their identity as the perpetrators of the murder. The court held that the evidence was properly admitted and that the respondents' conviction was safe. The appeal was dismissed.