R v Rogers
Case
•
[2021] ACTSC 355
•28 September 2021
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Rogers [2021] ACTSC 355
[2021] ACTSC 355
28 September 2021
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Jake David Rogers was convicted of making a demand accompanied by a threat, contravening a Family Violence Order, and possessing a prohibited substance. The case was heard in the ACT Magistrates Court. The legal issues before the court included the severity of the offences, Rogers' history of violence, and the appropriate sentence and treatment order to facilitate his rehabilitation.
The court considered the nature of the offences and Rogers' criminal history, including previous convictions for violence against women. The court noted that Rogers had a history of drug and alcohol abuse, which contributed to his violent behaviour. The court determined that a custodial sentence was necessary to protect the community and to deter Rogers from future offending. However, the court also recognised the need for rehabilitation and treatment to address Rogers' underlying issues.
The court sentenced Rogers to 15 months imprisonment for making a demand accompanied by a threat, 6 months imprisonment for contravening a Family Violence Order, and 3 weeks imprisonment for possessing a prohibited substance. The court also imposed a Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order, which includes core conditions, treatment and supervision requirements, and directions for Rogers to attend court and comply with the order. The custodial part of the order is suspended until Rogers' release from prison.
In addition to the sentence and treatment order, the court directed Rogers to appear in court on a specific date and to sign a sealed copy of the order and an undertaking to comply with it. The court also noted that the convictions and sentences for the primary and associated offences have been incorporated into the Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order.
The court considered the nature of the offences and Rogers' criminal history, including previous convictions for violence against women. The court noted that Rogers had a history of drug and alcohol abuse, which contributed to his violent behaviour. The court determined that a custodial sentence was necessary to protect the community and to deter Rogers from future offending. However, the court also recognised the need for rehabilitation and treatment to address Rogers' underlying issues.
The court sentenced Rogers to 15 months imprisonment for making a demand accompanied by a threat, 6 months imprisonment for contravening a Family Violence Order, and 3 weeks imprisonment for possessing a prohibited substance. The court also imposed a Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order, which includes core conditions, treatment and supervision requirements, and directions for Rogers to attend court and comply with the order. The custodial part of the order is suspended until Rogers' release from prison.
In addition to the sentence and treatment order, the court directed Rogers to appear in court on a specific date and to sign a sealed copy of the order and an undertaking to comply with it. The court also noted that the convictions and sentences for the primary and associated offences have been incorporated into the Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Sentencing
-
Contravention of Family Violence Order
-
Possessing a Prohibited Substance
-
Drug and Alcohol Treatment Order
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Rogers [2021] ACTSC 355
Most Recent Citation
Director of Public Prosecutions v Brymer [2025] ACTSC 430
Cases Citing This Decision
12
Director of Public Prosecutions v Brymer
[2025] ACTSC 430
Director of Public Prosecutions v Kayvanshokoohi
[2024] ACTSC 386
Director of Public Prosecutions v Rand
[2023] ACTSC 408
Cases Cited
39
Statutory Material Cited
7
R v Blackburn (No 1)
[2020] ACTSC 373
R v Fry
[2021] ACTSC 138
R v Tonna (No 1)
[2020] ACTSC 360