R v RERICH
Case
•
[2016] SASCFC 78
•1 August 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Rerich [2016] SASCFC 78
[2016] SASCFC 78
1 August 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In R v RERICH, the Court of Appeal considered an appeal against sentences imposed on the appellant, who had pleaded guilty to multiple offences including trafficking in a controlled substance, aggravated possession of firearms without a licence, possession of an unregistered firearm, being unlawfully on premises, and breach of bail. The appeal concerned the appropriate sentencing structure, specifically the interplay between concurrent and cumulative sentences, and the overall length of the custodial term.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the original sentencing judge had erred in the imposition of cumulative and concurrent sentences, and whether the total sentence was manifestly excessive or inadequate given the nature and circumstances of the offences. The court was required to determine the correct application of sentencing principles concerning offences arising out of the same transaction or course of conduct, and to assess the overall proportionality of the sentence.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, setting aside the original sentence. The court permitted the appellant to withdraw his plea of guilty to one count of possession of an unregistered firearm. The court then resentenced the appellant, imposing a cumulative sentence for the trafficking offence and one of the aggravated possession of a firearm offences, with other sentences to be served concurrently. A non-parole period was fixed, and the commencement date of the sentence was adjusted. The court also ordered the forfeiture of seized drugs, firearms, and cash, and disqualified the appellant from holding a firearms licence.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the original sentencing judge had erred in the imposition of cumulative and concurrent sentences, and whether the total sentence was manifestly excessive or inadequate given the nature and circumstances of the offences. The court was required to determine the correct application of sentencing principles concerning offences arising out of the same transaction or course of conduct, and to assess the overall proportionality of the sentence.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, setting aside the original sentence. The court permitted the appellant to withdraw his plea of guilty to one count of possession of an unregistered firearm. The court then resentenced the appellant, imposing a cumulative sentence for the trafficking offence and one of the aggravated possession of a firearm offences, with other sentences to be served concurrently. A non-parole period was fixed, and the commencement date of the sentence was adjusted. The court also ordered the forfeiture of seized drugs, firearms, and cash, and disqualified the appellant from holding a firearms licence.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Charge
-
Sentencing
-
Appeal
-
Breach
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Rerich [2016] SASCFC 78
Most Recent Citation
R v Best [2017] SASCFC 55
Cases Cited
9
Statutory Material Cited
1
Johnson v The Queen
[2004] HCA 15
R v Copeland (No 2)
[2010] SASCFC 61
R v Cutrale
[2011] NSWCCA 214