R v McAndrew
Case
•
[1999] WASCA 124
•17 AUGUST 1999
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v McAndrew [1999] WASCA 124
[1999] WASCA 124
17 AUGUST 1999
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Crown has appealed against the sentence imposed on the respondent, McAndrew, who pleaded guilty to sixteen charges, including five armed robberies and five counts of stealing as a servant. The court was required to decide whether the sentence of three years imprisonment was manifestly inadequate. The respondent had driven his accomplices to and from the crime scenes, and received a share of the stolen money from each robbery. The court held that the sentence was manifestly inadequate and that the terms of imprisonment should be cumulative rather than concurrent. The court found that the respondent's role in the robberies was significant and that his sentence did not reflect the seriousness of his criminal conduct. The court ordered that the sentences for the armed robberies and the stealing as a servant offences be served cumulatively, resulting in a total sentence of six years imprisonment.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Sentencing
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v McAndrew [1999] WASCA 124
Most Recent Citation
Lovatt v The State of Western Australia [2004] WASCA 265
Cases Citing This Decision
14
Lovatt v The State of Western Australia
[2004] WASCA 265
R v Hough
[2002] WASCA 42
Ginn v The Queen
[2000] WASCA 95
Cases Cited
12
Statutory Material Cited
1
KAT v The State of Western Australia
[2017] WASCA 11
KAT v The State of Western Australia
[2017] WASCA 11
Shaw v The Queen
[1952] HCA 18