R v Man Lung Ma
Case
•
[2024] NSWDC 573
•29 November 2024
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Man Lung Ma [2024] NSWDC 573
[2024] NSWDC 573
29 November 2024
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of R v Man Lung Ma involved the offender being convicted on 19 counts of attempted export of regulated native specimens. The charges were brought under section 303DD(1) of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) and section 11.1(1) of the Criminal Code (Cth). The court was tasked with determining the appropriate sentence for the offender, considering the seriousness of the offence and the relevant mitigating and aggravating factors. The offender was represented by counsel, and the prosecution was conducted by a representative of the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions.
The primary legal issue the court needed to address was the appropriate punishment for the offence of attempting to export regulated native specimens. This involved assessing the gravity of the offence, the offender’s culpability, and any relevant mitigating or aggravating circumstances. The court also had to consider the purposes of sentencing, including deterrence, retribution, and rehabilitation. The court needed to weigh the evidence presented regarding the offender's background, the circumstances of the offence, and any submissions made by the defence and prosecution. The sentencing principles applied required the court to ensure that the punishment was proportionate to the seriousness of the offence and that it served the broader objectives of the criminal justice system.
In delivering the sentence, the court found the attempted export of regulated native specimens to be a serious offence with significant potential environmental impacts. The court noted the offender’s lack of prior convictions and some mitigating factors, but also considered the commercial scale of the operation and the potential harm to biodiversity. After considering all relevant factors, the court sentenced the offender to a term of imprisonment of 3 years and 6 months, with a non-parole period of 2 years. The sentence was intended to reflect the seriousness of the offence while also taking into account the mitigating factors presented. The offender is to commence serving the sentence on 27 September 2023 and will be eligible for parole on 26 March 2027.
The primary legal issue the court needed to address was the appropriate punishment for the offence of attempting to export regulated native specimens. This involved assessing the gravity of the offence, the offender’s culpability, and any relevant mitigating or aggravating circumstances. The court also had to consider the purposes of sentencing, including deterrence, retribution, and rehabilitation. The court needed to weigh the evidence presented regarding the offender's background, the circumstances of the offence, and any submissions made by the defence and prosecution. The sentencing principles applied required the court to ensure that the punishment was proportionate to the seriousness of the offence and that it served the broader objectives of the criminal justice system.
In delivering the sentence, the court found the attempted export of regulated native specimens to be a serious offence with significant potential environmental impacts. The court noted the offender’s lack of prior convictions and some mitigating factors, but also considered the commercial scale of the operation and the potential harm to biodiversity. After considering all relevant factors, the court sentenced the offender to a term of imprisonment of 3 years and 6 months, with a non-parole period of 2 years. The sentence was intended to reflect the seriousness of the offence while also taking into account the mitigating factors presented. The offender is to commence serving the sentence on 27 September 2023 and will be eligible for parole on 26 March 2027.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Sentencing
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Man Lung Ma [2024] NSWDC 573
Most Recent Citation
CDirector of Public Prosecutions v Huang [2025] VCC 1210
Cases Citing This Decision
2
CDirector of Public Prosecutions v Huang
[2025] VCC 1210
CDirector of Public Prosecutions v Huang
[2025] VCC 1210
Cases Cited
10
Statutory Material Cited
3
Markarian v The Queen
[2005] HCA 25
Markarian v The Queen
[2005] HCA 25
McGregor v The King
[2024] NSWCCA 200