R v Male
Case
•
[2020] SASC 98
•11 June 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Male [2020] SASC 98
[2020] SASC 98
11 June 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of R v Male, the defendant was charged with the offence of attempted murder under the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA). The case involved the administration of a large quantity of Diazepam mixed in chocolate custard to the defendant's daughter, Amelia, with the intention of causing her death. The defendant, who had a history of mental health issues, claimed that she was not competent to form the requisite intent to commit murder. The case was heard by a judge sitting alone, without a jury.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the defendant had the requisite mens rea for the offence of attempted murder, given her mental state at the time of the alleged offence. The court had to consider the evidence of the defendant's mental health and capacity to form the necessary intent for attempted murder, as well as the objective elements of the offence.
The court found that the defendant had the requisite mens rea for the offence of attempted murder. The court accepted the evidence of the defendant's admissions to medical staff at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, in which she confessed to crushing up and feeding Diazepam tablets to Amelia with the intention of causing her death. The court also found that the objective elements of the offence of attempted murder had been established, as the defendant had deliberately administered a large quantity of Diazepam to Amelia with the intention of causing her death.
The court rejected the defendant's defence of insanity, finding that she was competent to form the requisite intent for the offence of attempted murder. The court found that the defendant's mental health issues did not impair her capacity to form the necessary intent for the offence, and that she was aware of the wrongfulness of her actions.
The court found the defendant guilty of the offence of attempted murder and ordered her to be detained in a mental health facility until she was no longer a danger to herself or others. The court also made orders for the defendant to undergo psychiatric treatment and for her to be subject to supervision and monitoring upon her release from the mental health facility.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the defendant had the requisite mens rea for the offence of attempted murder, given her mental state at the time of the alleged offence. The court had to consider the evidence of the defendant's mental health and capacity to form the necessary intent for attempted murder, as well as the objective elements of the offence.
The court found that the defendant had the requisite mens rea for the offence of attempted murder. The court accepted the evidence of the defendant's admissions to medical staff at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, in which she confessed to crushing up and feeding Diazepam tablets to Amelia with the intention of causing her death. The court also found that the objective elements of the offence of attempted murder had been established, as the defendant had deliberately administered a large quantity of Diazepam to Amelia with the intention of causing her death.
The court rejected the defendant's defence of insanity, finding that she was competent to form the requisite intent for the offence of attempted murder. The court found that the defendant's mental health issues did not impair her capacity to form the necessary intent for the offence, and that she was aware of the wrongfulness of her actions.
The court found the defendant guilty of the offence of attempted murder and ordered her to be detained in a mental health facility until she was no longer a danger to herself or others. The court also made orders for the defendant to undergo psychiatric treatment and for her to be subject to supervision and monitoring upon her release from the mental health facility.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Attempt
-
Breach of Trust
-
Mens Rea & Intention
-
Compensatory Damages
-
Insanity and Mental Impairment
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Male [2020] SASC 98
Most Recent Citation
Lowe v The King [2025] SASCA 24
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Lowe v The King
[2025] SASCA 24
R v BS
[2020] SASC 138
Lowe v The King
[2025] SASCA 24