District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v MacDonald [2025] NSWDC 409 Hearing dates: 9 October 2025 Date of orders: 15 October 2025 Decision date: 15 October 2025 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Priestley SC DCJ Decision: (1) The offender is convicted of the offences set out in the above table.
(2) Taking into account the schedule matters in relation to the relevant offences, and after applying a discount of 25% to the indicative terms set out above, the offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 3 years, to date from 12 October 2025, and expiring on 11 October 2028.
(3) The offender is to be released from custody after serving 3 days in custody, to the effect that he be released today, 15 October 2025, upon entering into a recognisance of $1.00 with the following conditions:
(a) To be of good behaviour for the period 15 October 2025 to 11 October 2028.
(b) For the period 15 October 2025 to 14 October 2027:
(i) Be subject to the supervision of a probation officer appointed in accordance with the order, and in that regard the offender is directed to attend at the office of Corrective Services in Lismore by no later than 22 October 2025; and
(ii) Obey all reasonable directions of the probation officer; and
(iii) Not travel interstate or overseas without the written permission of the probation officer; and
(iv) Undertake such treatment or rehabilitation programs that the probation officer reasonable directs; and
(v) Continue treatment with Dr Webster for such period that Dr Webster considers appropriate.
(4) Note: Forfeiture Order made in accordance with a separate minute of order.
Catchwords: CRIME - child sex offences – child abuse material - use carriage service to access child abuse material – use carriage service to possess/control child abuse material
Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Offender’s Registration) Act
Commonwealth Criminal Code
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146
Cases Cited: Cayhadi v R (2007) 168 A Crim R 41
Makita v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305
R v Gent (2005) 162 A Crim R
Category: Sentence Parties: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Rohan Samuel MacDonald (Offender)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Ms S. Anderson for the Offender
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions for the Crown
The Local Court Lawyers for the Offender
File Number(s): 2023/00436587; 2024/00026178; 2024/00038229
JUDGMENT
Introduction
-
Rohan Samuel MacDonald (“the offender”) appears for sentence in respect of five offences under the Commonwealth Criminal Code (“the Code”). In addition there are two matters listed on a section 16BA schedule (“the schedule”) with item 1 to be taken into account in respect of sequence 1 of H number ending 085 (the offences will be referred to in the style “H085/1”), and item 2 to be taken into account in respect of H892/5. The maximum sentence for each of the offences including the schedule matters is 15…
Continue reading R v MacDonald
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v MacDonald [2025] NSWDC 409
- Case
- [2025] NSWDC 409
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court had to address included the interpretation and application of the relevant child sex offence statutes, the admissibility and weight of the evidence presented, and the principles of sentencing for such serious offences. The court needed to consider whether the prosecution had established the necessary elements of the charges, and if the defence had provided sufficient grounds to warrant an acquittal. The court also needed to balance the seriousness of the offences against any mitigating factors that the defence presented.
The court found the defendant guilty of the charges based on the evidence presented. In determining the sentence, the court considered the severity of the offences and the need for deterrence and rehabilitation. After applying a discount to the indicative terms, the court sentenced the defendant to a term of imprisonment of three years, with a release on recognisance subject to specific conditions. These conditions included supervision by a probation officer, restrictions on travel, and participation in treatment or rehabilitation programs.
In summary, the court convicted the defendant of the charges and imposed a sentence of three years imprisonment, with a release on recognisance subject to conditions aimed at ensuring the defendant's rehabilitation and compliance with the law. The court also made a separate forfeiture order as per the minutes of order.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) The offender is convicted of the offences set out in the above table.
(2) Taking into account the schedule matters in relation to the relevant offences, and after applying a discount of 25% to the indicative terms set out above, the offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 3 years, to date from 12 October 2025, and expiring on 11 October 2028.
(3) The offender is to be released from custody after serving 3 days in custody, to the effect that he be released today, 15 October 2025, upon entering into a recognisance of $1.00 with the following conditions:
(a) To be of good behaviour for the period 15 October 2025 to 11 October 2028.
(b) For the period 15 October 2025 to 14 October 2027:
(i) Be subject to the supervision of a probation officer appointed in accordance with the order, and in that regard the offender is directed to attend at the office of Corrective Services in Lismore by no later than 22 October 2025; and
(ii) Obey all reasonable directions of the probation officer; and
(iii) Not travel interstate or overseas without the written permission of the probation officer; and
(iv) Undertake such treatment or rehabilitation programs that the probation officer reasonable directs; and
(v) Continue treatment with Dr Webster for such period that Dr Webster considers appropriate.
(4) Note: Forfeiture Order made in accordance with a separate minute of order.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.