R v Lelikan
Case
•
[2019] NSWCCA 316
•23 December 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Lelikan [2019] NSWCCA 316
[2019] NSWCCA 316
23 December 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the case of R v Lelikan, the respondent was found guilty of being a member of a terrorist organisation, specifically the Partiya Karkerên Kurdistanê (PKK), between 2011 and 2013. The respondent's involvement included travelling with the military arm of the organisation, supporting it in writings, wearing the uniform and insignia, and carrying arms. The respondent was sentenced to a Community Correction Order, with the sentencing judge considering the offence to be towards the lowest order of seriousness. The respondent appealed against the sentence on the basis that the sentencing judge erred in considering the merits of the PKK and the conflict in which it was engaged.
The legal issues before the court included whether the merits of the organisation and its cause should be taken into account when sentencing for membership of a terrorist organisation. The court noted that while the history and objectives of the organisation, its organisation and resources, and the fact that it does not advocate nor engage in indiscriminate killing of civilians are relevant factors, the merits of the cause and the classification of the conflict are not. The court also considered whether the respondent's belief in the rightness of the cause and their reasons for joining the organisation could mitigate their culpability.
The court found that while the respondent's belief in the rightness of the cause was not a relevant factor, the reasons for joining the organisation, namely the cruel treatment the respondent had experienced, could mitigate their culpability. However, the court found no error in the sentencing judge's exercise of residual discretion not to interfere with the sentence. The appeal was therefore dismissed, and the original sentence of a Community Correction Order was upheld.
No further orders were made by the court.
The legal issues before the court included whether the merits of the organisation and its cause should be taken into account when sentencing for membership of a terrorist organisation. The court noted that while the history and objectives of the organisation, its organisation and resources, and the fact that it does not advocate nor engage in indiscriminate killing of civilians are relevant factors, the merits of the cause and the classification of the conflict are not. The court also considered whether the respondent's belief in the rightness of the cause and their reasons for joining the organisation could mitigate their culpability.
The court found that while the respondent's belief in the rightness of the cause was not a relevant factor, the reasons for joining the organisation, namely the cruel treatment the respondent had experienced, could mitigate their culpability. However, the court found no error in the sentencing judge's exercise of residual discretion not to interfere with the sentence. The appeal was therefore dismissed, and the original sentence of a Community Correction Order was upheld.
No further orders were made by the court.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Mens Rea & Intention
-
Terrorism offences
-
Sentencing
-
Membership of terrorist organisation
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Lelikan [2019] NSWCCA 316
Most Recent Citation
Herki and Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (Migration) [2025] ARTA 1547
Cases Citing This Decision
18
Herki and Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (Migration)
[2025] ARTA 1547
R v Uweinat
[2021] NSWSC 1256
R v Uweinat
[2021] NSWSC 1256
Cases Cited
11
Statutory Material Cited
5
Benbrika v The Queen
[2010] VSCA 281
Minister for Home Affairs v Benbrika
[2020] VSC 888
IM v R
[2019] NSWCCA 107